Calogero is furious with the National Rally after the use of one of his music at a meeting

MUSIC – Calogero is “ scandalized “. This Monday, June 3, the star of French song reacted on her Instagram account after the broadcast of her song 1987 during the National Rally meeting, which was held at the Dôme de Paris this Sunday.

“At no time did I give any authorization to broadcast my music there. I affirm that I would never have given it”, writes the artist on his social networks. Before adding: “My songs are not made for the political framework, they belong to the public and only to the public. »

The interpreter of In front of the sea opposes “firmly” to what his music “be recovered by any party whatsoever”. Jordan Bardella, RN candidate in the European elections on June 9, spoke in front of more than 5,000 supporters at the Paris Dôme this Sunday.

“Paul Ecole, author of the text”1987‘, and I deplore a serious violation of our moral rights as soon as my work is associated with political discourse”concludes the musician who “reserves the right to take any legal action in this matter”.

Political parties do “often worth” that it is enough to be in good standing with Sacem (Society of Authors, Composers and Music Publishers), Pierre Lautier, lawyer specializing in copyright, explains to AFP. But Sacem, “who manages the exploitation rights” of music, “has in no way prerogatives over moral rights”he continues.

What French law says

Clearly, in parallel with declaring the use of a piece to Sacem, you must request permission from an artist or his rights holders for the use of a work.

“Under French law, an artist can argue that he did not intend to be associated with a political ideologydevelops Me Lautier. Or that a political group, with a registered logo and acronym, is like a brand, which must request authorization to associate music with a chocolate bar or a dishwasher. »

In the case where ” the damage is done “ in the eyes of the artist, his lawyers can choose “an action for monetary compensation before a court, but the deadlines are very long”the lawyer further specifies.

“There is also the possibility of an amicable settlement, often with a confidentiality criterion, which explains why there are few known decisions on the subject”, adds Pierre Lautier. Finally there is the option “a formal notice not to reuse this piece”concludes this specialist.

Also see on HuffPost :