Disturbing revelations emerge from US intelligence regarding the tragic death ofAlexei Navalny. According to an analysis relayed by the Wall Street Journal and shared by several American intelligence agencies, the responsibility of the Russian president Vladimir Poutine is not ruled out in this case.
Although Vladimir Poutine apparently did not directly order the assassination ofAlexei Navalny in February, the conclusions of American intelligence agencies underline that this does not completely exonerate him of all responsibility. This revelation sheds new light on the mystery surrounding the death of the famous political dissident in the Arctic gulag.
On February 16, the world was shaken by the announcement of the death ofAlexei Navalny, while he was serving his sentence in the IK-3 colony, located in the Autonomous District of Yamalo-Nenet, sixty kilometers beyond the Arctic Circle. His death occurred in a tense context, marked by international sanctions against Russia and delicate negotiations on prisoner exchanges between Moscow and the West.
The unanimous condemnation of the death ofAlexei Navalny by the American president and the international community pointed the finger at Vladimir Putin as the main instigator of this tragedy. However, the conclusions of the Wall Street Journal, based on analyzes by American intelligence agencies, call this assertion into question.
According to these agencies, it is unlikely that Vladimir Poutine gave the explicit order to end the life ofAlexei Navalny in prison camps in February. This conclusion, widely accepted within the intelligence community, is shared by agencies such as the CIA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the State Department’s Intelligence Unit.
However, it is important to emphasize that this analysis in no way excludes the involvement of Vladimir Putin in Navalny’s death. On the contrary, it emphasizes that although he probably did not order the assassination at that precise moment, his responsibility remains an open question, and his involvement in the affair remains subject to investigation.
