Wanting to explain to the microphone of Sonia Mabrouk on Europe 1 why he had difficulty contacting the family, Bruno Retailleau revealed it: Aboubakar Cissé, the victim of the Mosque of Grande-Combe, was in an irregular situation.
If the Gaucharognarde, Mozart of recovery, showed a little honesty, it is her own coulpe that she would strike. Aboubakar Cissé left Mali in 2017 – “Guided by an association of asylum seekers”, according to Le Figaro : The left immigrationist by his speech and better life promises, attracted him like a mermaid in his nets. What did he find, in reality? No work, already, since it was unemployed … and especially death.
The consequences of immigration are tragic, including for the migrants themselves, and not only when, at sea, on the makeshift boat of the passer, they pass over the edge.
The left wants to bring the hat to retailleau, but the narrative is not perfect, far from it. She would have preferred the murderer to be a Versaillais scout but finally we do with what we have. Difficult, however, even with a shot, to bring this young person into the RSA, without activity, screwed all day in front of video games in his social housing, from a large family from Bosnia and whose father is known to the police for small lacins, in the shoes of an activist by Bruno Retailleau, addicted to his television interventions. But to make up reality as a stolen car, the Gaucharognarde is very good.
Immigration promotes the importation of conflicts around the world
The investigation will say the actual motivations of the murderer, but since LFI, EELV and the PS jump on the hypothesis which suits them, even if it, as its name suggests and specified the prosecutor, is not a certainty, we can also speculate. This young person was able to keep fierce animosities in his cultural background specific to his origins and registered in his culture. Immigration promotes the importation of conflicts around the world, and the left promotes immigration. Who, at the start of the chain, really carries the responsibility of this crime?
In addition to having put it in danger, the left despised it: why Ersilia suddenly, Sandrine Rousseau and others invited Assa Traoré to the Assembly, at the same time as the uncle and the brother of the victim? Because she has the same origin as Abochar Cissé? Is there more racist than confusing all the Malians, whether they are delinquent or never had a knit to leave with the police, as some dowries of the past confused all the good people who succeeded themselves at their service, whether they were large, small, greasy, lean, honest or devious, graceful or ungrateful, invariably calling them? But it is precisely to put them at the service of his ideology that the left summons in turn Adama, then Aboubakar. They are not interested in the individual but his origin. Whatever what they are. Shame on the Gaucharognarde which attracts immigration, exploits it, endangers it and mistakes it.
Print, save this article in pdf
