The National Assembly voted on Friday, May 31, to remove the possibility of including a request for assistance in dying in advance directives, a provision which had been added in committee against the advice of the government.
The deletion amendment, submitted by the government, was adopted by 49 votes to 13. It is one of the points of tension in the debates on the bill on the end of life, currently being examined at the Palais Bourbon.
The Minister of Health, Catherine Vautrin, ardently defended a “text key” : the patient’s ability to express his or her will in a free and informed manner, up to the moment of the lethal action. However, the use of advance directives assumes that the patient is no longer able to reaffirm his wishes at that time. “A major red line would be crossed”said MP Patrick Hetzel (Les Républicains).
Read also | Article reserved for our subscribers End of life: at the opening of parliamentary debates, the government tries to counter criticism
Add to your selections
No voting instructions from parliamentary groups
Furthermore, this provision was found in the part of the text relating to palliative care, and not assistance in dying. Some elected officials therefore voted for the deletion to preserve the“tightness” between palliative care and assistance in dying, and not in opposition to the content.
Some of the deputies therefore wish to open this debate again next week, during the discussion of article 6 which specifies the conditions necessary for access to assisted dying. “We are consistent, we do not mix the two titlesexplained the deputy La France insoumise René Pilato, we will have amendments that will talk about advance directives, but within the framework of title two. »
Elected officials in favor of the possibility of including assistance in dying in advance directives emphasize the freedom of the patient. “Advance directives belong to the personsaid MP Monique Iborra (Renaissance), she can write whatever she wants. » During the debates, the deputies often indicated that they shared positions “personal”, different within the same group. No group gave voting instructions on this text.
Read also | Article reserved for our subscribers End of life: a “rupture” law after more than forty years of debate
Add to your selections
