But beyond the divided reactions, this affair raises fundamental questions. If the conviction of Nicolas Sarkozy sends a strong signal about the integrity of leaders, it also reflects a divide in the perception of justice. Some see it as a victory for the rule of law, others see it as a witch hunt against the elites. In a context of growing polarization, where distrust of institutions is exacerbated, this ambiguity could fuel theories of persecution, rather than strengthening citizen confidence.
The slowness of justice did not help. Appeals, appeals, and procedural maneuvers have punctuated this affair for years, sometimes giving the impression of a system running out of steam. It is urgent that judicial processes, and not only for public officials, be simplified and accelerated. Because, more than the sentence itself, it is the image of impartial and effective justice that is at stake. It would be fortunate if the outcome of Marine Lepen’s trial for embezzlement of European funds was rapid, in all respects. case well before the presidential election…
Final conviction or new trial? Nicolas Sarkozy fixed in the Bismuth affair
Finally, this conviction should mark the end of an era. One where the boundaries between public life and private interests could be blurred without much consequence. It highlights the growing demand for probity and transparency expressed by a population tired of business and scandals.
Beyond Nicolas Sarkozy, this affair is an essential reminder: democracies are only solid if their institutions remain exemplary. If justice can be perceived as harsh or divisive, it remains a fundamental pillar. Through this verdict, the very idea of an ethical and responsible policy is at stake, an idea that France needs more than ever.
