The Bucks trusted Damian Lillard to conclude • Basket USA

The Bucks trusted Damian Lillard to conclude • Basket USA
The Bucks trusted Damian Lillard to conclude • Basket USA

Blocked by the very demanding “concussion protocol” of the NBA, Damian Lillard champed at the bit for three matches. “I didn’t like not being with the team, not being able to play against Detroit or Charlotte or whatever. It was hard for me”comments the Bucks playmaker.

So he returned to face Houston, not a small piece for a Milwaukee team in difficulty since the start of the season. The meeting proved that it was complicated for Giannis Antetokounmpo and his teammates. It took until the last seconds, and the ball arrived in the hands of Damian Lillard.

“How many other players would you prefer over Queen in this situation?” We’re lucky,” wonders Brook Lopez. “It’s easy for me to say that I want to play the action, but deep down, I’m a leader who wants to win, who wants to do things well,” pursuit Giannis Antetokounmpo. “If Dame is on the field, and even if I’m told I have to do it, then you have to find him and get the ball in his hands to make the decision. »

Not really skillful after eight days in the infirmary, the former Portlander only shot 6/18 and 0/6 from 3-point range (but he delivered 10 assists).

He was therefore smart to play this last shot – 100-99 for Houston then – with penetration and a layup.

“I felt that it was a match where it was necessary for me to attack, to have my foot on the accelerator at the end of the match and that’s what I did”says Damian Lillard, who “the experience of these moments”.

Damian Lillard Percentage Rebounds
Saison Team MJ Min Shots 3pts LF Off Def To Pd Fte Int Bp Ct Pts
2012-13 BY 82 39 42.9 36.8 84.4 0.5 2.6 3.1 6.5 2.1 0.9 3.0 0.2 19.0
2013-14 BY 82 36 42.4 39.4 87.1 0.4 3.1 3.5 5.6 2.4 0.8 2.4 0.3 20.7
2014-15 BY 82 36 43.4 34.3 86.4 0.6 4.0 4.6 6.2 2.0 1.2 2.7 0.3 21.0
2015-16 BY 75 36 41.9 37.5 89.2 0.6 3.4 4.0 6.8 2.2 0.9 3.2 0.4 25.1
2016-17 BY 75 36 44.4 37.0 89.5 0.6 4.3 4.9 5.9 2.0 0.9 2.6 0.3 27.0
2017-18 BY 73 37 43.9 36.1 91.6 0.8 3.6 4.5 6.6 1.6 1.1 2.8 0.4 26.9
2018-19 BY 80 36 44.4 36.9 91.2 0.8 3.8 4.6 6.9 1.9 1.1 2.6 0.4 25.8
2019-20 BY 66 38 46.3 40.1 88.8 0.5 3.8 4.3 8.0 1.7 1.1 2.9 0.3 30.0
2020-21 BY 67 36 45.1 39.1 92.8 0.5 3.7 4.2 7.5 1.5 0.9 3.0 0.3 28.8
2021-22 BY 29 36 40.2 32.4 87.8 0.4 3.7 4.1 7.3 1.3 0.6 2.9 0.4 24.0
2022-23 BY 58 36 46.3 37.1 91.4 0.8 4.0 4.8 7.3 1.9 0.9 3.3 0.3 32.2
2023-24 MIL 73 35 42.4 35.4 92.0 0.5 3.9 4.4 7.0 1.8 1.0 2.6 0.2 24.3
2024-25 MIL 10 36 44.4 34.8 90.9 0.8 3.8 4.6 6.6 1.9 1.0 2.7 0.2 26.0
Total 852 36 43.8 37.0 89.8 0.6 3.6 4.2 6.7 1.9 1.0 2.8 0.3 25.1

How to read the stats? MJ = matches played; Min = Minutes; Shots = Successful shots / Attempted shots; 3pts = 3-points / 3-points attempted; LF = free throws made / free throws attempted; Off = offensive rebound; Def=defensive rebound; Tot = Total rebounds; Pd = assists; Fte: Personal fouls; Int = Intercepts; Bp = Lost balls; Ct: Against; Pts = Points.

Senegal

-

-

PREV The Red Devil who is paid dearly for not playing
NEXT The Club | The efficiency rating of shifts, curved paddles… and longer placements