A disagreement which does not exceed freedom of expression, according to the court
This was not the conclusion of the Paris Court of Appeal, which ruled in a ruling dated October 31: « The unlawful nature of the reason for the dismissal pronounced, even in part, due to the employee’s exercise of his freedom of expression, a fundamental freedom, alone leads to the nullity of the dismissal. (…) Failing the COJOP to demonstrate the alleged abuse, the court held that Mr. Chesbeuf’s expression of disagreement did not exceed the limits of freedom of expression recognized to employees. »