“If political ecology is content to criticize power, it is condemned to remain powerless”

“If political ecology is content to criticize power, it is condemned to remain powerless”
“If
      political
      ecology
      is
      content
      to
      criticize
      power,
      it
      is
      condemned
      to
      remain
      powerless”

INTERVIEW – In a recently published essay, Towards war ecologythe philosopher explains how ecology becomes an issue of power and rivalry between nations. An enlightening diagnosis at a time when the war in Ukraine puts the climate issue back at the heart of the geopolitical game.

A graduate and doctor of philosophy, Pierre Charbonnier is a research fellow at the CNRS and a lecturer at Sciences Po. He published “Towards the ecology of war. An environmental history of peace” (La Découverte).


LE FIGARO. – Your book is based on the premise that peace, based on increased trade and the exploitation of natural resources, has been built to the detriment of the climate and the environment. How did you come to formulate this thesis? ?

Pierre CHARBONNIER. – My thesis may seem strange; however, it is obvious. We only need to look at the curves of energy consumption levels to see that they exploded after the Second World War. The massive deployment of fossil fuel infrastructure from 1945 onwards was based on a reflection on the failure of the post-First World War pacification process. We realized that it was not enough to say that war was forbidden or illegitimate…

This article is reserved for subscribers. You have 87% left to discover.

Want to read more?

Unlock all items immediately.

Already subscribed? Log in

-

PREV European stock markets end without common direction
NEXT 19 days to climb 82 peaks over 4000 m, the dizzying performance of Kilian Jornet – Libération