Euro 2024: we reviewed the France – Belgium of 2018 and there was no reason to be “seum” for the Belgians

Euro 2024: we reviewed the France – Belgium of 2018 and there was no reason to be “seum” for the Belgians
Euro 2024: we reviewed the France – Belgium of 2018 and there was no reason to be “seum” for the Belgians

The semi-final of the Russian World Cup, between France and Belgium (1-0), was the source of a “seum”, a Belgian disgust, which the rewatching of the match swept away.

How is a myth created? The question, worthy of an examination, applies perfectly to the 2018 World Cup match between France and Belgium (1-0). In any case, this is what provokes the rewatch of this semi-final, six years after this duel of “seum”.

If the opposition had indeed proven to be tight on the pitch in Saint Petersburg, this July 10, 2018, nothing indicated an ultra-domination of the Red Devils. If not sterile.

Sterile Belgian possession against French opportunities

The figures are clear: Hazard, then playing master of Chelsea, and his partners displayed superior ball possession (64%) and made almost double the number of passes (594 against 346). Enough to get frustrated. However, the occasions were rather tricolor. Beyond the shots (19 French attempts to 9), the famous “expected goals” are largely favorable to Didier Deschamps’ men (1.91 xG against 0.38).

The pitch also goes in this direction. “DD” had prepared his move well, leaving the initiative to the Belgians, while opposing a 4-3-3 block to the loss of the ball. In this respect, the first curtain formed by Griezmann, Mbappé and Giroud had proven essential. As much as the second, built by an impressive Matuidi and Pogba in volume and duel, but also a tenacious Kanté. Enough to isolate De Bruyne. While Lukaku had gotten stuck between Varane and Umtiti.

No red waves

In fact, until the goal from a corner by “Big Sam” and his celebration “broke the gait” (51st), the two teams had created an opportunity each: a pivotal shot from Alderweireld for a save from Lloris ( 22nd) and a save from Courtois in front of Pavard (39th).

And after the opening goal? No red wave on the horizon. But two hot moments: a header from Fellaini that went wide (65th) and a beautiful 25m shot from Witsel saved by Lloris (81st). Not really the apnea described by some.

In front of Mick Jagger, the Blues could even have not been friendly with the Devils and doubled the bet through Giroud (56th) or Tolisso (90th + 6) without a decisive Courtois. We know the end of the story. That even rewriting won’t change.

-

-

PREV 2024 legislative elections in Val-de-Marne: Mathilde Panot re-elected in the first round in the 10th constituency
NEXT N2: Ogy was surprised by Fontaine