Musique –
Drake takes his dispute with Kendrick Lamar to court
Drake believes that Universal Music has taken the side of Kendrick Lamar in the clash between the two rappers for several months.
Published today at 1:14 a.m.
Drake, during an NBA game in Houston, Texas.
Getty Images via AFP
Subscribe now and enjoy the audio playback feature.
BotTalk
Canadian rapper Drake has taken his venomous clash with Kendrick Lamar to court, accusing Universal Music of inflating the California hip-hop star’s streams and defaming him, according to court documents and American media on Tuesday.
Rivals for years, the two artists released several vitriolic pieces one after the other in 2024 to criticize each other, a practice that is part of hip-hop culture.
In “Not like us”, Kendrick Lamar, Californian rapper crowned with a prestigious Pulitzer Prize, accuses Drake of having relationships with underage girls and calls him a “pedophile”.
900 million streams
The song, which exceeds 900 million plays on Spotify, became one of the artist’s most listened to and received several Grammy nominations in 2025, including best song of the year.
Kendrick Lamar, who released a surprise album on Friday, was also chosen to perform the halftime concert of the next Super Bowl, the final of the American football championship, in 2025, an immense privilege for an artist in the United States .
It is in this context that Drake, under contract with Universal, like Kendrick Lamar, launched two proceedings, respectively before a court in New York and one in Texas. These are not complaints but a first procedural step which serves to collect evidence for subsequent legal actions.
Universal boot in touch
In the first, dated Monday, the Canadian accuses Universal Music Group (UMG) of having made Spotify pay lower broadcast rights on the condition that the streaming platform recommend “Not Like Us” massively to its subscribers. According to a court document, Drake also accuses UMG of having used bots (computer automation machines) to artificially inflate the number of plays of this song.
“The idea that UMG would do anything to harm one of its artists is shocking and false (…) fans choose the music they want to listen to,” responded a UMG spokesperson when asked by AFP.
In the second procedure, revealed Tuesday by the specialist site Billboard, Drake’s lawyers believe that UMG “could have refused to release or distribute the song (“Not Like Us”) or demand that the offensive remarks be edited and/or deleted ”, but “she chose to do the opposite.”
AFP
Did you find an error? Please report it to us.
0 comments
