Formula 1, a sport synonymous with evolution and innovation, is once again under the microscope as its latest proposal to extend the points system to the top 12 ranked has drawn heavy criticism. Leading the revolt is former F1 team owner Eddie Jordan, who has vigorously dismissed the idea as “total nonsense,” saying it dilutes the competitive essence of the sport.
A Radical Change in the Points System
The proposal stems from the imminent arrival of an 11th team, General Motors Cadillac, in 2026, which would expand the grid to more than 22 drivers. To accommodate the growing number of entrants and potentially improve competition among mid- and lower-ranked teams, Formula 1 is considering awarding points to the top 12, a change that would mark a significant shift from the current structure of the top 10.
Additionally, the plan follows recent adjustments including the cancellation of the bonus point for fastest lap, further fueling debates over whether F1 overcomplicates its points system.
The Anger of Eddie Jordan: 'Stop the Nonsense!'
Never one to hold back his words, Eddie Jordan launched a scathing criticism of the proposed changes. The outspoken Irishman argued that tampering with the points system undermines the competitive spirit of the sport and trivializes the value of good performance.
“I am absolutely against these adjustments with nonsense and points, for heaven's sake, up to 12th place – they will soon give points to everyone on the grid. It's just nonsense,” Jordan said bluntly.
For Jordan, the competitive heart of Formula 1 lies in the quest for victory, not simply scoring points for intermediate positions.
“When you compete in life, and you compete in every different aspect, there is a compulsion among us – and that competitive urge is to win. There is the winner, then the second is the first of the losers, then it is the second of the losers and the third of the losers. That’s how I see it.”
A Historical Perspective: From Top Six to Top Ten
The Formula 1 points system has evolved over the decades. In the early years, only the top six finishers earned points, emphasizing the importance of elite performance. When the top ten system was introduced, it initially met similar resistance. However, over time, drivers, teams and fans have adapted to the change, with many recognizing its role in instigating closer battles across the grid.
The Argument Against: Encouraging Competition
Supporters of the proposed extension of the points system argue it could intensify battles between bottom and mid-table teams. For smaller teams like Williams, Haas or Sauber, finishing in the points represents a significant achievement and a tangible reward for their efforts. Expanding the points system could increase the motivation for teams to fight more intensely in the later rounds, making the sport more inclusive and competitive.
Will the Fans Accept It?
Formula 1 fans are notoriously protective of the sport's traditions, and any major changes to its structure are met with skepticism. Although some argue that expanding the points system will dilute the prestige of scoring points, others believe it could create more exciting battles across the grid.
Eddie Jordan's tough stance highlights the division within the sport over the balance between tradition and modernity.
What's Next for the Proposal?
With the proposal still under review, the question remains: will F1 continue with its plan to expand the points system, or will resistance from figures like Eddie Jordan and purist fans force the governing body to reconsider?
One thing is certain: Formula 1's incessant quest for evolution is always accompanied by its share of controversies.
