The imminent inauguration of Donald Trump is raising concerns among United Nations agencies. During his first term, the former American president significantly reduced financial contributions from the United States, left several organizations of the United Nations, including the Human Rights Council, and initiated the withdrawal from the WHO. This time, experts say, the cuts could be even faster and more brutal.
Financial support from the United States, the main contributor to the United Nations, is critical. Yet Trump’s new ambassador, Elise Stefanik, calls the organization “broken and crippled.” Some observers even fear a Republican bill aimed at pulling the United States out of the UN, a hypothesis analysts say is unlikely as Washington tries to counter China’s growing influence.
Among the potential targets of the Trump administration: the WHO, which could be abandoned at the beginning of the mandate. Despite efforts to diversify funding, the organization remains dependent on American contributions. According to experts, the divorce would be “painful”, even if it does not mark the end.
Reproductive rights and agencies such as UNFPA or UN Women may also suffer from American policies. In his first term, Trump cut basic funding to some organizations, accusing them of controversial practices. Despite everything, officials are showing some optimism, citing the strength of UN agencies.
Faced with these uncertainties, the United Nations is preparing to reduce its spending and is actively seeking new financial partners. However, experts say an already weakened Europe may not be able to fill the gap left by the United States.
Canada
