Algeria raises its voice. In a meaningful diplomatic gesture, Algiers summoned French Ambassador Stéphane Romatet to express its indignation at what it describes as unacceptable provocations and interference. A decision which comes against a backdrop of disturbing revelations, accusing the French intelligence services (DGSE) of maneuvers aimed at destabilizing the country, and which marks a new milestone in already very tense bilateral relations.
Relations between Algeria and France are going through a new zone of turbulence. The summoning of the French ambassador to Algiers by the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs constitutes a strong diplomatic act. This approach comes in a tense context, marked by serious accusations targeting the French intelligence services for their alleged involvement in a destabilization campaign in Algeria. The episode illustrates the exacerbation of tensions between the two countries, against a backdrop of repeated provocations and alleged interference.
DNAlgérie has learned from reliable sources that this summons reflects the disapproval of the highest Algerian authorities in the face of what they describe as hostile acts by France. The accusations relate in particular to a campaign led by the DGSE to recruit former Algerian terrorists for subversive purposes. One of the examples cited is that of Mohamed Amine Aissaoui, former member of a terrorist group, who testified on the channel AL24 by denouncing an attempt at manipulation by the French services.
The Algerian authorities, far from minimizing the matter, have indicated that these actions will not remain without consequences. In a strong statement, they warned that they would take the necessary measures to defend their sovereignty in the face of any attempt at foreign interference.
This summons comes after a series of events which seriously undermined trust between Algiers and Paris. The arrest of Boualem Sansal, an Algerian writer accused of having made comments undermining the territorial integrity of Algeria, triggered a wave of criticism in the French media. The media coverage orchestrated in France was seen in Algeria as a frontal attack, with accusations of bias and disinformation. This climate of tension was amplified by inflammatory statements from certain French public figures, notably Bernard-Henri Lévy, known for his strong positions on international affairs.
These incidents are part of a series of gestures perceived as unfriendly by Algiers: Paris’ alleged support for the dissident movements MAK and Rachad, accused of promoting terrorist activities in Algeria, as well as the lack of cooperation in investigations into sensitive cases. , such as the seizure of weapons at the port of Béjaïa. Added to this are recurring diplomatic frictions, exacerbated by the divergent positions of the two countries on regional issues such as Western Sahara.
Faced with this situation, Algeria has opted for a strategy of diplomatic firmness while avoiding rhetorical excesses. By recalling its ambassador to Paris last July, Algiers had already expressed its dissatisfaction with France’s increased support for the Moroccan autonomy plan for Western Sahara, a position seen as a direct affront. This new summons of the French ambassador to Algiers is a continuation of this firm posture.
However, Algeria insisted on remaining within the formal frameworks of international relations. She rejects insults and slander and insists on the need to preserve mutual dignity in exchanges. By relying on diplomatic principles, Algiers seeks not only to defend itself but also to send a strong signal to national and international public opinion.
This rise in tensions takes place in a context where some observers accuse the French political class of diverting attention from internal problems by pointing the finger at Algeria. The economic crisis, social movements and political divisions in France create fertile ground for this type of diversionary strategy. By making Algeria a scapegoat, certain lobbies in France are perhaps seeking to strengthen a feeling of national unity in the face of an “external enemy”. However, this approach could prove counterproductive, further fueling Algerian resentment.
For Algeria, this episode is an opportunity to recall the importance of vigilance in the face of foreign maneuvers. The firmness displayed by Algiers aims not only to protect its sovereignty but also to show that it will not hesitate to take radical measures if the situation requires it. This diplomatic standoff could further intensify if France does not moderate its positions or if new revelations corroborate the accusations made against the French intelligence services.
Ultimately, this summons is a political act of great significance. It marks a turning point in the management of Algerian-French bilateral relations, calling for a review of practices and a reaffirmation of the principles of mutual respect. Faced with these tensions, dialogue seems more necessary than ever to prevent differences from turning into open conflict.
Also read:
“What sells in New York will sell at Algiers airport”: the CEO’s promise
Oran Airport: a traveler hides more than 12,000 euros in shoes
Algiers Airport: Mokhtar Mediouni makes a grandiose revelation
