Donald Trump may benefit from partial immunity, US Supreme Court rules

Donald Trump may benefit from partial immunity, US Supreme Court rules
Donald Trump may benefit from partial immunity, US Supreme Court rules

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday extended the deadline in the criminal trial against Donald Trump, who is accused of conspiring to overturn his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, effectively ending the possibility that the former president will be tried before the Nov. 5 election.

In a historic 6-3 decision, the justices ruled for the first time that former presidents enjoy absolute immunity from prosecution for their official acts and no immunity for unofficial acts. But the justices ordered lower courts to figure out precisely how to apply the ruling to Donald Trump’s case, rather than doing so themselves.

This result poses additional delay before Donald Trump can be tried in the case brought by special prosecutor Jack Smith.

The court’s decision in a second major case involving Donald Trump, along with its decision rejecting efforts to exclude him from the ballot because of his actions following the 2020 election, underscores the direct and perhaps uncomfortable role that justices play in the November election.

“Under our constitutional separation of powers structure, the nature of presidential power entitles a former president to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for acts within his evidentiary and exclusive constitutional authority,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court. “And he enjoys at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts.”

Justice Roberts was joined by the five other conservative justices. The three liberal justices issued a dissenting opinion.

“Today’s decision to grant criminal immunity to former presidents reshapes the institution of the presidency. It makes a mockery of the fundamental principle of our Constitution and our system of government that no one is above the law,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a scathing dissenting opinion.

Justice Sotomayor, who read aloud a summary of her dissent in the courtroom, said the Court’s protection of presidents “is as bad as it seems, and it is without merit.” “.

The ruling is the last of the session and comes more than two months after the court heard arguments, much more slowly than in other epic high court cases involving the presidency, including the Watergate tapes affair.

The former Republican president has denied doing anything wrong and said this lawsuit and three others were politically motivated to try to prevent him from returning to the White House.

In May, Donald Trump became the first former president to be convicted of a crime in a New York court, for falsifying business records to conceal a payment to a porn actress for her alleged sexual relations with him, which he denies. He still faces three other charges.

To watch on video

-

-

PREV Juraj Slafkovsky is happy that his parents no longer have to work
NEXT Eurozone inflation down slightly to 2.5 percent in June, Italy rate at 0.9 percent