[POINT DE VUE] So when Trump wins, democratic voting is a dictatorship

We can't stop leftists anymore. At this stage of delirium, we are squarely in self-parody. Liberation has just published the column of a professor at the University of California in Los Angeles – the famous UCLA, whose letters adorned the sweatshirts of the generation 80sremember. This French girl (she's a lady), living on the west coast, is packing her bags. She is going to leave the country because she no longer recognizes the United States, which has become, according to her, a “ old country » macho and retrograde. And even more: in fact, for her, as for the mouthpiece of cultural leftism, the United States has become a dictatorship. Read this excerpt, which Libé highlights on the social network Well, that's it, it's done. Here we are. The “largest democracy in the world” has surrendered to the announced dictatorship. Officially. Regularly. By the ballot box. »

So, wait… I believed – and no doubt many other people did too – that the vote of the people characterized democracies. Could there be a right and wrong way to vote? Perhaps we could, in the course of a discussion, quickly arrive at the famous Godwin point by saying that Hitler, too, was elected in the regular way? What contempt. What stupidity, too. As the RN says, in this rather inspired way, “ when the people vote, the people win “. But there you go: the people are stupid, that’s the problem, isn’t it? When we talk to him about happy diversity, multiculturalism, universality of human rights and open-mindedness wokehe doesn't find it as cool as he should. He persists in seeing what he sees, in seeing what he is forbidden to talk about: the knife attacks, the migratory invasion, the drag queens in schools, the downgrading of the West, the lessons that no one listens anymore… He doesn't live in these huge padded hamster cages that are Tribeca, Beverly Hills or the XI^e district of Paris, he, the people.

I'm afraid we couldn't care less about the opinion of this unfortunate teacher, who is probably an excellent university professor (” an excellent teacher “, sorry!), but whose opinion is no better than that of any French citizen who has the same diplomas (or not, for that matter). It is also very possible that almost all of France could care less about the homilies of Libé. This newspaper of urban and well-off white people, whose public only crosses the borders of the ring road with great difficulty, is on an infusion of public money (our money)… and all that to say, to people who have no no need, how they should think, vote, speak. Not once has the consent of the French to the financing of Liberation was not questioned. Not once, either, has the plurality of opinions been respected by Liberation. Nor was it asked whether Arcom was a regulatory body or a censorship body. But that, obviously, is not dictatorship. No. It has nothing to do with it. France, with its crimes of opinion, its memorial laws, its progressive ayatollahs who are well established, its Constitutional Council which censors the popular will, is “the country of human rights”, “the nation of tolerance », as Saez sang in 2002, against the FN. It's simple though.