Major scientific journals vote against Trump, but are less effective than Taylor Swift

Major scientific journals vote against Trump, but are less effective than Taylor Swift
Major scientific journals vote against Trump, but are less effective than Taylor Swift

« Vvote for Kamala Harris to support science, health and the environment”, can we read the title of an article published on September 16 in Scientific American by the editors of the journal. With the caption: “Kamala Harris has plans to improve health, boost the economy and mitigate climate change. Donald Trump […] has a dangerous record. »

Founded in 1845, Scientific American is a true institution. Many Nobel Prize winners have published articles there. Has the prestigious American popular science magazine decided to free itself from the scientific field and apoliticism? Yes, but in a very exceptional way. This is only the second time in the 179-year history of the journal that the editors of Scientific American lend their support…


The science and tech newsletter

Every Saturday at 4 p.m.

Receive all the latest science and tech news and dive into major talks, major discoveries, innovations and behind the scenes…

Merci !
Your registration has been taken into account with the email address:

To discover all our other newsletters, go here: MyAccount

By registering, you accept the general conditions of use and our confidentiality policy.

-

-

PREV Trump campaign uses GoFundMe to raise millions of dollars online
NEXT Revaluation of APL, small pensions, gas prices… Everything that changes on October 1st