The leader of the Parti Québécois (PQ), Paul Saint-Pierre Plamondon, predicts that, within a few years, young people will be the group most in favor of independence, particularly because of the links that can be established between the project sovereignty and other projects carried by this generation, such as the fight against climate change.
In interview at Everyone is talking about iton the airwaves of ICI Télé, Paul Saint-Pierre Plamondon was called to react to a recent Léger survey, which places the PQ at the top of the voting intentions, but which also indicates that 58% of 18-34 year olds are against the Quebec sovereignty project.
The PQ leader, who promises a referendum on the issue in his first term if he is elected, first stressed that an increase in support for independence and for PQ has been noted among young people in recent years.
We are starting from afar, because the project has fallen into oblivion, in a certain way, since 1995
he told host Guy A. Lepage.
My prediction is that the group that will be most in favor of independence in a few years will be young people, because it is a social project.
This is a new chapter in which we are consistent, particularly on the environmental level, because we are going to stop sending our money to Alberta oil and tax havens.
Paul Saint-Pierre Plamondon has advanced as much as a new chapter in relation to indigenous nations
could be considered
.
Once this Canada of colonial origin is a thing of the past, we will be able to begin negotiations as equals and find lasting ground for coexistence.
Two weeks ago, the PQ leader said he was convinced he could win a third referendum if he took power.
“Wokism” and Québec Solidaire
To make the sovereignist project a reality, Paul Saint-Pierre Plamondon seemed comfortable with the idea, launched by the jester of the king
of the evening, MC Gilles, of having to collaborate with the deputies of Québec solidaire, despite their numerous disagreements.
For people to vote yes, we have to accept that we are going to disagree on everything else
thinks the PQ leader.
It’s normal in a democracy to have disagreements, we can agree on the essentials.
The last few weeks have been particularly tense between the two sovereignist groups.
In reaction to the controversial remarks of solidarity MP Haroun Bouazzi – who claimed to witness racism every day in the National Assembly – the PQ leader affirmed last week that it was a recurring process of Québec solidaire
than to accuse him of being racist.
Open in full screen mode
Montreal MP Haroun Bouazzi finds himself in a delicate situation for having said that he witnesses racism every day in the National Assembly. (Archive photo)
Photo : - / Sylvain Roy Roussel
Inventing remarks to signal one’s virtue on a false basis, but also trying to make adversaries inaccessible, that no longer works in Quebec. We’ve experienced it in recent years, and now we don’t want that anymore. It no longer passes through the population, it no longer passes through political parties
he declared in the press scrum.
Then, a few days ago, Paul Saint-Pierre Plamondon denounced the wokisme
supported by Québec solidaire for several years.
A term that he was able to clarify on the set of Everyone is talking about it.
Distortion of words, victimization, intimidation by words like racist
, – Phoebe
, intolerant
… Paul Saint-Pierre Plamondon considers that “wokism” results in different behaviors, and that this trend goes beyond Haroun Bouazzi.
[Cette critique] focuses on Québec solidaire, but more broadly on an ideological movement. We can call it woke, radical left, neoprogressism… But the behavior no longer works.
It aims to prevent dialogue and discussion
judges the PQ leader, who also denounces the imposition of certain concepts by “wokism”, which emerged simultaneously, such as systemic racism, white privilege, microaggressions, safe spaces (safe space), defunding the police to fight crime and unceded territories.
Someone who serves social justice, I encourage that. I just don’t want there to be any more intimidation or misinformation to make dialogue impossible
however, wanted to clarify the PQ leader. I don’t think that’s an unreasonable request.