“There, we’re going too far”: after a slip-up, David Pujadas intervenes in the middle of a debate between Yvan Le Bolloc’h and Georges Matharan

“There, we’re going too far”: after a slip-up, David Pujadas intervenes in the middle of a debate between Yvan Le Bolloc’h and Georges Matharan
“There, we’re going too far”: after a slip-up, David Pujadas intervenes in the middle of a debate between Yvan Le Bolloc’h and Georges Matharan

David Pujadas moderated a debate entitled The great confrontation this Thursday June 13, 2024 live on LCI. Two groups were opposed: the pro-far-right and the anti-far-right. Among them was the actor Yvan Le Bolloc’h who challenged the YouTuber Georges Matharan (who worked for the media Current values And black bookeditor’s note) while the latter mentioned the riots of 2023 after the assassination of young Nahel, whose videos contradicted the version given by the police officer, namely that the teenager had attacked a police officer.

Is it better to kill him first?”

The YouTuber then declared that “refusal to comply results (…) in the death of innocent people. It is a rational choice that police officers must make. They have to choose: do they kill offenders who could potentially kill innocent people, or…“. Yvan Le Bolloc’h immediately cut him off: “So, be careful! There’s a kid who died! Oh !“. But Georges Matharan continued by explaining that yes “the police do not dare to shoot” the offender “kill an innocent” during “the chase“.”How can you know it ?“, asked his interlocutor, confused. “Well… It’s, it’s… It’s happening, eh! Refusals to comply have increased“, the videographer simply retorted. “So it’s better to kill him first?“, the actor was surprised. “Yeah !“, replied Georges Matharan, facing a totally shocked Yvan Le Bolloc’h.

David Pujadas reframes his guest

David Pujadas then intervened: “No ! No ! There, I think the words go beyond your thoughts, there. Non ! No. We are no longer in the opinion“. Yvan Le Bolloc’h asked the YouTuber to reconsider his comments: “Take it out!“. But the latter persisted: “In this case, we chose to kill an innocent person crossing the road?“.”No, Georges Matharan, you act as if there was a death every time! ‘Better to kill him first? Yes!’, no, we can’t. Here we are going too far“, estimated the journalist. Georges Matharan defended himself: “I put myself in the policeman’s place, he has an urgent choice to make“. When Nahel died, it was

#TheGreatConfrontation

pic.twitter.com/vKVIvNZLvC— the dead (@wh0isnoah) https://twitter.com/wh0isnoah/status/1801343220900839811?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
-

-

NEXT Howard Jones Takes a Break from Musician Mansion During Busy Year of New Projects