The advisors of the majority of the departmental council asked Nadège Lefebvre to come alone, without the members of her cabinet, Monday morning January 27. She will have to explain under what conditions her closest collaborators wrote a memo detailing the means to sink Oise Hebdo.
The “Oise-Hebdo-Gate” continues to have consequences on the department’s policy. In a secret note, the existence of which the president herself confirmed (without condemning), the departmental council wanted to appropriate the title Oise Hebdo from the INPI to prevent the publication of the weekly and its publications. seize the domain name oisehebdo.fr, if necessary by paying for the services of a “hacker”, to destroy the newspaper.
This attempted sabotage of a modest local newspaper accused of independence of mind shocked more than one. Departmental advisor-senator Olivier Paccaud wrote: “Wanting to silence a media outlet is contrary to all democratic principles.” Councilor Arnaud Dumontier says this attack “makes him nauseous.” From everywhere, there is bronca against the president, her authoritarianism, her functioning in closed mode, her lack of grandeur of vision, her absence of political sense. Because also, behind these management errors which delight the oppositions, there are elections that they do not want to lose.
Nadège Lefebvre cancels Monday's plenary meeting.
This meeting of the 34 elected representatives of the majority was to be followed, at 9 a.m., by a public plenary assembly. This would not have lacked interest. The 8 elected representatives of the opposition would not have failed to ask questions about the “Oise-Hebdo-Gate”. There would even be the possibility of voting on a motion of no confidence in the president.
But Nadège Lefebvre found a solution to this risk of public humiliation. She sent a message, today Friday January 24, to cancel this public plenary assembly.
“By this message,” she declared, “I inform you that the Assembly meeting of January 27, which included only one report, is canceled, this report not being finalized.”
A majority of opponents of Nadège Lefebvre
Phew, Nadège Lefebvre had a narrow escape.
-A vote could have gone badly because the “nadegists” became a minority. There are, according to our calculations and estimates, only 11 Nadegists against 23 anti-Nadegists.
Remaining with Nadège Lefebvre: 11 nadegists
- Nadège Lefebvre – Beauvais 2: (well we think she still supports herself)
- Béatrice Lefebvre – Beauvais 1: (her sister)
- Frédérique Leblanc – Méru: (always on the side of power)
- Denis Pype – Saint-Just-en-Chaussée: (stiff as an agricultural cigarette)
- Nicole Cordier – Saint-Just-en-Chaussée: (which has the same stiffness)
- Patrice Marchand – Chantilly: (who believes that Jean-François Mancel is still there)
- Maxime Minot – Clermont: (the most faithful of sycophants)
- Sandrine de Figuereido – Compiègne 2: (blessed and delighted)
- Anaïs Dhamy – Estrées-Saint-Denis: (both feet firmly planted in the Picardy soil)
- Franck Pia – Beauvais 2: (Nadège’s pair and engaged against Caroline, one woman at a time is enough)
- Thibault Delavenne – Noyon: (coming from the left, the advantage of defectors is that they are loyal)
and 23 anti-Nadegists
- Cory Neau – Senlis: (Senlis is not La Chapelle-aux-Pots, is it?)
- Jérôme Bascher – Senlis: (who believes he would do much better in the same place)
- Bruno Caleiro – Méru: (because he prefers the policy of smiles to the reign of terror)
- Isabelle Wojtowiez – Chantilly: (Woerthist, therefore pro-Courtial therefore anti-Nadège)
- Patrice Fontaine – Estrées-Saint-Denis: (because he does not want unaccompanied minors in his canton)
- Martine Borgoo – Grandvilliers: (because Nadège is really not her cup of tea)
- Luc Chapoton – Crépy-en-Valois: (because he is Horizons-Edouard Philippe and not LR)
- Gilles Sellier – Nanteuil-le-Haudouin: (because he doesn’t like being treated like a kid)
- Nicole Colin – Nanteuil-le-Haudouin: (because she is rebellious when she feels the wind turning)
- Eric de Valroger – Compiègne 1: (he never appreciated Nadège)
- Olivier Paccaud – Mouy: (because he does not share all of the president’s points of view…)
- Sandrine Connell – Crépy-en-Valois: (because she is Chapoton’s partner)
- Pascal Verbeke – Grandvilliers: (because he is part of Olivier Paccaud’s party)
- Benoît Biberon – Chaumont-en-Vexin: (because he has an even worse temper than Nadège)
- Anne Fumery – Mouy: (this is the Paccaud team)
- Sophie Levesque – Chaumont-en-Vexin: (because she did not appreciate being sent by the president to defend the home for unaccompanied minors in front of the national press)
- Arnaud Dumontier – Pont-Sainte-Maxence: (because he has had enough of incompetence)
- Christophe Dietrich – Nogent-sur-Oise: (because he is outspoken and we don't talk to him like a child)
- Jean Desessart – Compiègne 2: (because he wants to be re-elected in 2028, 2034, 2040…)
- Danielle Carlier – Compiègne 1: (because she did not appreciate Nadège's ambiguity towards the RN in the last legislative elections)
- Charles Locquet – Beauvais 1: (because he thinks that politics works better with a little politics)
- Teresa Dias – Pont-Sainte-Maxence: (because we can do better)
- Gillian Roux – Nogent-sur-Oise: (because she joined Jean-François Dardenne, in Nogent)
There remain the seven elected representatives of the opposition plus Ophélie Van Elsuwe, elected from Clermont, who would also have voted against Nadège: i.e. 31 against 11.
However, this calculation does not have much consequence because the president is irremovable. The budget should not be voted on. But there, the anti-Nadegists are protesting. “We have to remain reasonable,” said one. We are not here to break the machine. I have never been disloyal and I never will be, but she must take into consideration that she takes with her all the elected officials who have absolutely nothing to do with it.”
Funnier and more cynical, another adds: “I think nothing will happen at the end of the meeting. We're going to pretend we're not happy. She will deny it. We're going to pretend to believe her. And we’ll move on.”
