If it is very common to attend a criminal trial which ends with a conviction in accordance with the requisitions of the prosecution, or even a little more lenient, the case judged on Monday invites us not to believe in the immutable principle.
In this case, where Cidali Bouazza appeared for violent theft, the public prosecutor demanded four years and five months (the five months relate to a previous suspended sentence which was partly revoked) in prison. Insufficient for the court which handed down a sentence of six years and ten months.
A robbery to be able to afford coke
As soon as the hearing was over, Me Nicolas Hilaire, the lawyer for…