A sanction imposed after !

A sanction imposed after !
A sanction imposed after Reims!

Published on 12/17/2024 at 10:11 a.m.
1 minute reading

Passionate about sport and more particularly football since my early childhood.


Read more

Despite the geographical proximity to , which should have allowed a record attendance at the stadium, fans of firecrackers and smoke bombs once again made a name for themselves during the match at . Environ 880 supporters Lensois lit pyrotechnic devices in the stands, thus perpetuating a controversial tradition but anchored in the culture ultra.

© RC official website

A double-edged celebration

For many fans, the use of smoke bombs is seen as a way to celebrate the team and create a spectacular atmosphere. This practice reinforces the feeling ofcollective identity and is an integral part of the folklore of the stands. However, these pyrotechnic demonstrations are far from trivial and raise serious questions about their impact. They expose fans to potential risks and can detract from the overall match experience.

Undesirable consequences

Although motivated by a desire for unconditional support, the repeated use ofpyrotechnic devices by Lensois supporters could turn out to be counterproductive. The competent authorities may be required to take severe sanctionsgoing so far as to outright ban the presence of fans during future matches. Such a measure would deprive the team of a valuable supportas was probably the case during the trip to Havrewhere the players had to do without their usual 1,000 supporters.

A call for responsibility

Although part of a centuries-old traditionthe use of smoke bombs and firecrackers in stadiums raises numerous interrogations. It is up to the supporters to find a fair balance between celebrating their passion and respecting safety rules. A reflection is necessary in order to preserve theambiance festive while avoiding unwanted deviations.

-

-

PREV Clermont-Ferrand unveils its new “tram-bus”, cheaper than a tram and smoother than a bus
NEXT Angélique Angarni-Filopon under fire from critics, Eve Gilles intervenes firmly