Parkinson’s: difficult analgesia for central pain

Parkinson’s: difficult analgesia for central pain
Parkinson’s: difficult analgesia for central pain

The management of central Parkinsonian pain (CP) is unsatisfactory, although it affects 10 to 28% of patients. Understanding the biological mechanisms involved allows us to suspect two molecular pathways within the basal ganglia: dopaminergic dysfunction, altering pain pathways and their modulation processes, and the involvement of opiate receptors. However, the benefit of levodopa and opiates on CP has never been explored. Therefore, this randomized study versus placebo is the first to evaluate the comparative efficacy of targeting these two pathways.

Eight weeks of stable dose analgesia after gradual titration

OXYDOPA is a randomized, prospective, multicenter study which was carried out in France in 15 French expert centers for Parkinson’s disease (PD) belonging to the NS-Park/FCRIN network. This study included PD patients aged 45 to 75 years suffering from PCD for ⩾ 3 months with an intensity of ⩾ 30 mm on a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain in the last month.

To be included, they had to be on stable antiparkinsonian treatment, alone or in combination with analgesic treatment (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen) or co-analgesic (antidepressants, antiepileptics) of level 1 stable for at least 4 weeks. They were randomized (1:1:1) between the administration of oxycodone LP (extended release, 40 mg/day maximum), an administration of levodopa/benserazide (200 mg maximum) and a placebo. These treatments were administered for 8 weeks at a stable dose after a gradual titration phase of 2 weeks to the optimal dose). Then, an 8-day washout phase was observed. The primary evaluation criterion was the change in mean pain intensity between D0 and D71.

Effectiveness comparable to placebo

A total of 63 patients were included in the study (mean age 62–66 years, 39–55% male, mean VAS 51.7–60.2 mm). Over the 8 weeks, mean daily doses were 20.7 mg for oxycodone SR and 183.3 mg for levodopa/benserazide, respectively.

There was no significant difference between the three groups on the primary criterion: the reduction in pain at the end of the 8 weeks was respectively -17 mm for oxycodone LP, -8.3 mm for levodopa/benserazide and -14.3 mm for placebo. There was also no significant difference in the maximum intensity of pain felt during the last week. The percentage of responders (30% reduction in mean intensity) was however significantly higher in the oxycodone LP group compared with the levodopa/benserazide group (52.2% vs 15% respectively).

The incidence of adverse events was comparable in the three arms of the study (90%) and specific to the molecules used (mainly nausea, constipation, somnolence in the oxycodone group, pain and dyskinesia in the levodopa/benserazide group, pain and nausea in the placebo group).

The authors emphasize that the response to placebo is particularly important, knowing that 40% and 15% respectively in this arm of the study reported an improvement of at least 30% or at least 50% in pain. average. Furthermore, the average tolerated dose of oxycodone LP was lower than the 40 mg initially planned, “ which may have reduced the chances of detecting a more powerful analgesic effectt ».

Regarding the levodopa/benserazide arm, it is possible that the analgesic effect of the drug is already effective since the patients were already receiving it at the beginning of the trial. But a dosage increase beyond that implemented here is undoubtedly difficult to envisage given the risk of dyskinesia, which already concerned a portion of the patients allocated to this group. Other approaches that deserve evaluation include the norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitors gabapentin and pregabalin, as well as nonpharmacological interventions. »

-

-

PREV Use of a rainfall indicator to identify a context favorable to the occurrence of an epidemic of acute gastroenteritis of waterborne origin. Exploratory study
NEXT Case study: health and climate change, part I