The year 2024 saw the rebirth Le Comte de Monte Cristo on the big screen with a bold and successful adaptation, led by Pierre Niney. This film was able to captivate thanks to a rhythmic direction, deeply human characters and an effective narration which found the right balance between fidelity to the text of Alexandre Dumas and modernity. Unfortunately, this new television mini-series, which seemed to want to explore more of the subtleties of the original story, struggles to convince. The first two episodes, which cover a good part of the first volume, could have laid the foundations for a captivating drama. However, the result is a rushed introduction, where the emotional and narrative issues are too often left aside.
Wrongly accused of treason, Edmond Dantès, a young sailor, is imprisoned without trial at the Château d'If, a sinister fortress off the coast of Marseille. After many years of captivity, he finally escapes and, under the identity of the Count of Monte Cristo, he plans to take revenge on those who unjustly condemned him.
The starting point of Le Comte de Monte Cristo is one of the most emblematic of French literature: Edmond Dantès, a talented young sailor with a bright future, sees his life turned upside down the day he falls victim to a plot orchestrated by men consumed by jealousy and ambition. On paper, this scenario remains an ideal basis for a series adaptation. The viewer could expect a gradual rise in dramatic tension, an in-depth exploration of the characters, and an immersive setting that highlights the injustice of which Edmond is a victim. Unfortunately, the miniseries seems too eager to get to the “spectacular” part of the story – the one where Edmund, transformed into a vengeful count, plays with his enemies in a Machiavellian game of chess.
This haste comes at the expense of emotion and the construction of the characters, essential elements to make the drama truly poignant. From the first episodes, it is difficult to become attached to the characters, in particular to Edmond Dantès and Mercédès. Their relationship, meant to be the emotional heart of the story, lacks depth and subtlety. Mercédès, who should embody pure and unshakable love, is reduced to the role of an extra. It is difficult to feel the tragedy of their separation or the impact it has on their respective lives. In the same way, the antagonists – Danglars, Fernand and Villefort – lack relief. Their motivations are hinted at, but never developed enough for their betrayal to carry any real weight.
Danglars' jealousy of Edmond's success, Fernand's obsessive love for Mercédès, or even Villefort's excessive ambitions would have deserved a more nuanced treatment. These characters become archetypes rather than complex individuals, which diminishes the emotional impact of their actions. One of the major problems with these first two episodes is the way in which they condense much of the first volume. This narrative choice could be justified by the desire to devote more time to revenge intrigues, but it deprives the story of key moments. Edmond's descent into hell, which should be a dramatic crescendo, is here. His arrest, his betrayal by those he considered friends, and his imprisonment at Château d'If lack weight.
These events, which should plunge the viewer into a spiral of indignation and empathy, are treated mechanically. Likewise, Edmond's meeting with Father Faria, a crucial step in his transformation, is barely explored. The abbot, a fascinating character rich in wisdom, seems relegated to the rank of a simple narrative tool. This relationship, which could have added a philosophical and emotional dimension to the story, is reduced to a succession of facts. Visually, the series also lacks audacity. The sets and costumes, although correct, fail to compensate for the often flat production. Where the film with Pierre Niney shone with careful artistic direction and dynamic staging, the series offers an aesthetic that is more functional than memorable.
Key scenes, such as Edmond's arrest or his first confrontation with Villefort, lack tension. We don't fully feel the injustice or despair of the main character. Likewise, the dialogues, sometimes too explanatory, weigh down the pace instead of serving it. It's hard not to compare this miniseries to the film released this year. The latter, although he took certain liberties with the original work, was able to captivate thanks to a subtle balance between action, emotion and narrative complexity. The series, on the other hand, seems to hesitate between fidelity to the novel and excessive simplification. By wanting to say too much, she ends up diluting her point. Viewers who know the story of Edmond Dantès may feel frustrated by this adaptation which skims over the most poignant moments.
As for those discovering the story for the first time, they risk missing the dramatic intensity and subtleties that make the work so rich. It would be unfair to deny the ambitions of this series. Adapt a monument of literature like Le Comte de Monte Cristo is a colossal challenge, and it is obvious that the creators sought to offer a version that stands out from previous adaptations. Unfortunately, these first two episodes show clumsy execution, where the narrative and aesthetic choices struggle to convince. The absence of significant moments and a real immersion in the world of the story leaves a feeling of unfinished business. Viewers have the right to expect more from a series that tackles such a masterpiece.
These first two episodes of Le Comte de Monte Cristo leave a mixed impression. While the idea of condensing the beginning of the story to focus on the revenge plots is understandable, its rushed and superficial execution prevents one from fully immersing themselves in the narrative. The characters lack depth, the emotions are stifled, and the narration, too fast, does not give the spectators time to feel the weight of the events. If the series wishes to captivate over time, it will absolutely have to correct the situation in the following episodes by offering more subtlety and intensity. In the meantime, these beginnings pale in comparison to the recent film, which managed to combine modernity and respect for the spirit of the original work. A lesson that this television adaptation would do well to meditate on if it hopes to reconcile with its audience.
Note : 4/10. In short, an adaptation that struggles to convince.
Coming soon on France 2
