Manhandled on social networks since the broadcast of Seven to Eight on Sunday, Anne came out of silence on Tuesday in a video from Legend Story. The fifty-year-old, who lost more than 800,000 euros because of a fake Brad Pitt, notably attacked the journalist who produced the report for the TF1 magazine. “Obviously know that the journalist stayed for 2 days to interview me and he only retained what should not have been retained in fact, to sully my image solely in order to attract an audience.“, she notably asserted before claiming that the show also lied about her relationship with her daughter.
The production of Sept à Huit responds to Anne, the victim of fake Brad Pitt
Pointed out by the one who thought she was in a virtual couple with Brad Pitt, the production of Seven to Eight decided to speak out to defend the work of its teams. “The facts that are reported in the report are facts that she reports directly. The witnesses who speak in this report are witnesses who speak freely. The documents that are produced are documents that were provided to us by Anne herself. Until proven otherwise, everything said in the report is true.” said Philippe Pécoul, the producer and editorial director of Seven to Eightat TV Mag. Returning to the editing of this report, which was widely commented on on social networks, he insisted that “Basically, there was nothing to take away from what was said.” “Everyone is free to judge our work. Everyone is free to appreciate the reports produced on air. What matters is the intellectual honesty with which they are made and the quality of the work that has been done.”he stressed.
A complaint filed against Sept à Huit?
Asked about a possible complaint from Anne, the victim of the fake Brad Pitt, Philippe Pécoul revealed that the channel and the production (Elephant) have, for the moment, received “no formal notice document or any formula from him attacking them”. “EMaybe she’ll do it, I don’t know, but we’re not there yet in our relationship with her.“, he added before once again defending the report. “We can always attack a report, of course. I still consider to this day that, from our point of view, this report reports the facts, does not comment on these facts, explains the spiral of which she was the victim, based on documents that she provided to us, direct testimonies from her and from people who witnessed this scam, that is to say her daughter and her best friend.
