Joe Biden says Donald Trump’s immunity sets ‘dangerous precedent’

Joe Biden says Donald Trump’s immunity sets ‘dangerous precedent’
Joe Biden says Donald Trump’s immunity sets ‘dangerous precedent’

US President Joe Biden said on Monday, July 1, that the Supreme Court’s decision on Donald Trump’s criminal immunity for his actions as president sets a “dangerous precedent.”

By a majority of six to three – conservative justices against progressives – the Court held that “the president enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts” but that he “is entitled to at least a presumption of immunity for his official acts.” Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts based the decision on “consistent principles of separation of powers.”

The Court therefore refers the case back to the court of first instance to determine which acts are potentially immune from criminal prosecution. The burden is on the prosecution to demonstrate that they are not when they were carried out in the exercise of its functions.

Donald Trump welcomed a “historic decision”ensuring that it invalidated the bulk of the charges in the four criminal proceedings against him. By this jurisprudence, Donald Trump will be “emboldened to do what he wants, when he wants” in the event of victory in the presidential election next November, Joe Biden estimated

“Roi”

Beyond the case of Donald Trump, This decision “redefines the institution of the presidency” by transforming its incumbent into a “king above the law in every use of his official power,” wrote Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent joined by her two progressive colleagues.

“When the president does it, it means it’s not illegal,” quips John Dean, White House counsel at the time of the Watergate scandal in 1974, citing then-President Richard Nixon’s line of defense. “Upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2024,” he concludes.

According to Steven Schwinn, a constitutional law professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, “to the extent that Donald Trump was trying to drag this out until after the election, he was completely successful.”

Lack of a real trial before the vote“there could be detailed hearings on the facts charged in the indictment to determine which ones are eligible for immunity, which will serve to remind the public of all of Trump’s actions and the events of January 6” 2021, nevertheless underlines former federal prosecutor and professor of criminal law Randall Eliason. The entire procedure for this trial, initially scheduled to start on March 4, had already been suspended for four months.

The editorial team recommends

News from the RTL editorial team in your mailbox.

Thanks to your RTL account, subscribe to the RTL info newsletter to follow all the news every day.

Read more

-

-

PREV The management of the Ravenel Hospital Center gives its version following the death of Anne Baudonnel, 29 years old
NEXT Kamala Harris would do better than Joe Biden, but it’s not enough