Boualem Sansal, who, in his rantings, ceded a good part of our territory to the western neighbor [lors d’un entretien accordé au site identitaire français Frontières, l’écrivain franco-algérien avait repris la position du Maroc selon laquelle le territoire du royaume aurait été tronqué sous la colonisation française au profit de l’Algérie]was sent as a scout to probe the determination of the Algerian state to defend its borders. The opportunity was a propitious one for all the people to demonstrate their unwavering attachment to the extent of national sovereignty over the tiny part of their vast territory.
Through its official institutions and its political parties, the citizen thus provided a scathing response to the aims of a certain still nostalgic France. Emmanuel Macron, who is drowning in the governance of his country, believes “save your skin” [selon cet édito d’El-Watan] by riding the extremist wave that is sweeping his country.
He did not hesitate to use immature words, which dishonor the stature of a real president. In this French run, it turns out that one Boualem is hiding another. After Sansal, the newly naturalized writer, comes the turn of the influencer Naman Boualem propelled by the same hateful circles to maintain negative pressure on our country.
One-sided view
In his umpteenth vain attempt, the current Minister of the Interior [Bruno Retailleau]well known for his empathy with immigration, has ignored all democratic laws by replacing the judicial and executive authorities of his own country. It should be noted that in the case of the influencer, French justice has not yet examined the case, since it is scheduled for January 24. Bruno Retailleau, hoping to embody, all alone, the hard line of policy against foreigners, is intertwined in the missions and prerogatives of his own government.
In such circumstances, Algiers’ response was not long in coming, far from it. The deportee was taken back to the plane which brought him back. The reaction of our country was not lacking in “amaze” both the Minister of the Interior and that of Foreign Affairs [Jean-Noël Barrot].
The latter, during his televised intervention [sur LCI]invited himself to our house to, he said, discuss current issues. He does not rule out, by way of retaliation, resorting to the eternal levers of granting visas, development aid, etc.
Such a unilateral vision of relations between the two countries will have no advantageous future. It is imperative to review everything as equals. This is the only possible compromise.
