Trendyol hosted Trabzonspor in Galatasaray’s field in the 16th week of the Super League.
In the 55th minute of the match played at Rams Park, Eren Elmalı centered the ball from the left wing. Receiving the ball in the penalty area, Ozan Tufan sent the ball into the net with his shot.
After this goal, Galatasaray players objected that Eren turned the ball from outside. The referee, who consulted with VAR for a while, approved the goal.
Fırat Aydınus: I’m closer to not dating
Former referee and TV 8.5 commentator Fırat Aydınus commented on the position in question: “There is an issue whether the ball was released before Trabzonspor’s 3rd goal. Here, it looks like the ball was released from one angle and not from another angle. It is not possible to make a clear comment on this ball without looking at the goal line. Based on my experience, I am closer to whether it was released. There is VAR in this position. “The reason why it is not included is that there is no clear evidence and it looks different from different vulnerabilities.” he said.
Deniz Ateş Bitnel: I think the whole ball did not leave the line
Former referee Deniz Ateş Bitnel is “It is not possible to say anything clearly unless it is shown from the line camera! Based on my experience, I can say that the projection of the ball was on the line! So in my opinion, the entire ball did not leave the line!” he said.
Galatasaray won a penalty from VAR
At the 60th minute of the match, Barış Alper headed the ball into the penalty area, which the Trabzonspor defense could not clear as they wanted. Mertens was down in a double fight with Malheiro.
After this position, Galatasaray players objected that the position was a penalty.
Referee Kadir Sağlam, who watched the position on VAR, gave a penalty decision. Batshuayi, who took charge of the ball in the penalty shootout, sent the ball into the net.
Fırat Aydınus: This position is a penalty
Former referee Fırat Aydınus for the position where Galatasaray won a penalty “of Galatasaray While Mertens was trying to take a position in the penalty he won, Malheiro’s foot came towards his opponent as he wanted to kick the ball. This position is a penalty.” he said.
Deniz Ateş Bitnel: VAR intervention is correct
Deniz Ateş Bitnel, for the position where Mertens remained on the ground “The intervention against Mertens was a penalty. VAR intervention is correct” he commented.
Yunus – Cham position became a matter of debate
In the match, Trabzonspor’s Muhammed Cham was left on the ground after a double fight with Galatasaray’s Yunus Akgün.
While the referee was making a foul decision, there was a card objection on the Trabzonspor side. However, the referee did not change his decision.
Fırat Aydınus: There should have been at least a yellow card
Fırat Aydınus, for this position “The move Yunus made with his arm towards Cham was very risky. This move should have been at least a yellow card, but if a red was given on the border, on the field, VAR would not interfere with it. However, the referee did not even call a foul.” he commented.
Trabzonspor waited for a penalty
In the last stages of the match, Banza fell to the ground during an air ball fight with Muslera in the Galatasaray penalty area.
After this position, the referee continued the game while Trabzonspor players were waiting for a penalty.
Erman Toroğlu: According to the book, Muslera’s move was a penalty
Former referee and Ekol TV commentator Erman Toroğlu, “It is not for me, but the game rule does not say so. If I were on the VAR, I would call, if I were on the field, I would give a penalty. According to the book, Muslera’s move is a penalty.” he said.
Fırat Aydınus: If it had hit his opponent’s face, it would have been a penalty
Fırat Aydınus is “If Muslera’s intervention against Banza in the penalty area had come into his opponent’s face, it would have been a penalty, but considering the current intensity and violence, the decision to continue is correct.” he said.
Deniz Ateş Bitnel: It should have been a penalty
Deniz Ateş Bitnel, one of the former referees, also “Muslera made a timing mistake and his intervention on Banza should have been a penalty.” he commented.
