As the 2024 edition of Spotify Wrapped lands, it begs the question: is this celebration of Music really about what we listen to, or what it says about who we are?
The Spotify music app
Getty Images
Spotify Wrapped has refined its formula since its debut in 2015, arriving each year with the zeal of a life coach, the whimsy of a fortune teller, and the precision of a statistician.
At times, Wrapped offers an insightful glimpse into the year’s musical journey; at others, it feels like another instance of music’s datafication. While few listeners may care about the exact number of songs they’ve streamed, many find joy in playlists that remind them of places they’ve frequented, moments of emotional significance, or abrupt life changes.
More than just a quirky recap of listening habits, Wrapped offers surprising insights into identity patterns, culture, and the growing role of technology in shaping self-perception. And despite its gimmicky nature, Wrapped can feel personal and profound, helping us understand ourselves through the lens of clicks, skips, and loops.
”Uniquely Yours” – Which Way to My Spotify Tribe?
Music preferences have long been one of the easiest ways to break the ice among strangers. They are also deeply intertwined with identity, serving as a universal rite of passage for modern youth. Even in the farthest corners of Brazilian shanty towns, children clutch life-sized posters of Taylor Swift, while music journalists argue that the idols we choose offer a profound glimpse into the soul.
How well does this narrative stack up against the latest big data insights?
A study of a remote Amazonian tribe challenges the idea that the brain determines musical preferences. Instead, it attributes musical taste to cultural origin. Researchers at MIT distinguish between the propensity for certain chords (such as C and G) popularized in Western pop music and the preference for less-consonant sounds prevalent in non-Western cultures. Sociologists have also found that our collective tendency—even as babies—is to favor the music and sounds most familiar to us.
Globally, it is already well-known that around half of an individual’s income is determined by their location or place of birth. Whether someone is likely to protest this fact by attending a punk concert or a reggae festival appears to be influenced by the same geographic factor.
Spotify Wrapped, then, is more than a personal playlist—it’s a curated snapshot of the broader cultural and societal forces that shape our listening habits.
”For Being in Your Own Spotify World” - A Mirror to Personality Traits
More than just a playlist, Wrapped doubles as a personality test. Studies have suggested that musical taste is deeply tied to personality traits, and findings from a machine learning study run by Spotify offers a fresh perspective on this phenomenon.
Spotify’s data scientists explored the connection between the Big Five personality traits and listening habits, revealing revelatory insights. Enabled by a sample of 17.6 million songs and 662,000 hours of music listened to by 5,808 Spotify users over three months, the study concluded that musical preferences could predict personality traits with moderate to high accuracy.
Listeners of soul or “lively” music (e.g., Let the Good Times Roll by Ray Charles) showed correlations with emotional stability. By contrast, blues or “brooding” music (e.g., Karma Police by Radiohead) tended to have the opposite effect. Fans of jazz and country scored higher on the “agreeable” personality trait than listeners of death metal or “aggressive” music (e.g., Last Resort by Papa Roach).
Similarly, R&B and Latin music lovers ranked highly in agreeableness, while those favoring regional music (Japan), gothic, or rock scored lower. Modern and alternative rock fans fell on the lower end of the emotional stability spectrum compared to blues, old country, or soul listeners.
The study also uncovered the primary reasons behind listening habits: participants predominantly used Spotify to regulate emotion or match goal-oriented behavior. Anthropologists might frame this as a commentary on Western culture’s relentless drive for productivity and its enduring search for happiness.
“Spotify Time Capsule” – What Happens in High School Stays Etched in Our Psyche Forever
Spotify on iPhone
getty
In 2020, an AI bot behind the “How Bad Is Your Spotify” program took over the then Twittersphere, delivering scathing remarks like, “Your jam hasn’t changed since the Obama era.” While difficult to admit, anecdotal evidence supports the idea that adults often struggle to outgrow the music they loved as teenagers.
A New York Times analysis using Spotify data backs this theory. The study suggests that the songs we listen to as teenagers shape our musical tastes as adults. Across the Western world, it pinpointed the ages at which people are most likely to discover their favorite songs—13 for women and 14 for men. Women were also found to be more influenced by their formative years.
Musical preferences often coincide with the emotional highs and identity formation of adolescence. These songs act as cognitive time capsules, evoking moments of heartbreak, discovery, and self-realization.
Wrapped taps into this nostalgia, celebrating listeners’ enduring love for the familiar while reinforcing the idea that musical taste is often frozen in time.
“Discover Weekly” – The Spotify Algorithm’s Role in Shaping Taste
How much autonomy does the average user have in choosing how they interact with Spotify’s algorithm?
Much has been written about Spotify’s supremacy as a streaming service, in great part due to its music discovery algorithms and recommendation engine built on collaborative filtering model, NLP and audio models.
The same algorithm is ‘’instructed’’ to keep the user’s finger as far away from the skip button as possible by recognizing and including played songs in future playlists. The service is rooted in familiarity, and its playlists centred around emotions, moods and activities as opposed to individual artists, albums, or genres.
That way, the platform’s recommendation algorithm doesn’t merely predict what users might enjoy—it steers their listening habits.
But is this level of personalization good for music—or for listeners? Critics argue that Spotify’s algorithmic curation contributes to the homogenization of taste. By prioritizing familiarity and engagement, the platform risks limiting exposure to diverse genres and niche artists.
The rise of “playlistification,” where songs are grouped by vibe rather than artist or album, reflects this shift. While seamless discovery keeps users hooked, it commodifies music, reducing complex compositions to functional background noise. Wrapped, for all its charm, reinforces this trend by celebrating hours logged over the depth of exploration.
“Everything I Know About Music” – Where to Next?
In essence, Spotify Wrapped offers a unique chance for self-discovery. Its digital trail can help listeners better understand their personality traits and the conscious—or unconscious—ways they rely on music in daily life.
By downloading and analyzing Spotify listening history or completing a musical questionnaire, music lovers can uncover surprising revalations, akin to a therapy session. Reminiscing about favorite tunes can evoke nostalgia, reuniting listeners with their teenage selves. Along the way, they might also reflect on how their place of origin has shaped their musical preferences and broader identity.
Yet, Wrapped raises deeper questions about autonomy, diversity, and the influence of algorithms in shaping what we hear. As the 2025 edition arrives, listeners should savor it—but may also consider stepping beyond its curated playlists. Attending a local concert, exploring an unfamiliar genre, or diving into music far outside one’s comfort zone can be just as rewarding.
Because in the end, musical identity isn’t just about what we listen to – it’s about how and why we engage with it.
