Why no revaluation in October 2024?

The great upheaval of small pensions

The pension reform put in place a system aimed at increasing “small pensions”. On paper, the intention is laudable: to offer a financial boost to the most modest retirees. But in reality, the implementation turns out to be more complex than expected.

Around 850,000 people are affected by this revaluation. A figure which may seem important, but which only represents a fraction of the 17 million retirees in . Therefore, a question arises: why some and not others?

Eligibility criteria: a real obstacle course

To benefit from this revaluation, retirees must meet several conditions, forming a real administrative labyrinth:

  • Have a pension calculated at the maximum rate
  • Proof of at least 120 quarters of contributions, all basic schemes combined
  • Receive a basic pension not exceeding €847.57 per month (increase included)
  • Have a total amount of pensions (basic and supplementary) not exceeding €1,352.23 per month (increase included)

These criteria, as precise as they are restrictive, explain why many retirees find themselves excluded from the system.

The revaluation timetable: a two-step process

The implementation of this revaluation took place in two waves, creating a form of temporal inequality between the beneficiaries:

  1. First wave : Around 600,000 retirees saw their pension increased from September 2023.
  2. Second wave : The remaining 250,000 retirees must wait “no later than October 2024” to benefit from the increase.

This one-year gap between the two groups raises questions about the fairness of the system and the ability of pension organizations to effectively manage these changes.

The amount of the revaluation: between hopes and realities

The promised increase varies between 50 and 100 euros per month, depending on individual contributions. This range, although significant for some, may seem insignificant to others, especially in the face of the galloping inflation that the country is experiencing.

The minimum contribution (Mico) is supposed to guarantee a minimum income corresponding to 85% of the net SMIC for people who have worked their entire career on the SMIC. A measure which, on paper, seems generous, but which in reality only concerns a fraction of retirees.

READ ALSO: Agirc-Arrco increase in November 2024: how much will you receive?

The catch-up puzzle

For retirees from the second wave, catch-up is planned. They should receive in September 2024 the 12 months of unpaid increase, or around 600 euros gross. A payment that could be welcome, but which raises questions:

  • Why did you wait a year to make this catch-up?
  • How did the retirees concerned manage this year without the promised increase?
  • Doesn’t this one-off payment risk impacting their taxes?

READ ALSO: Revaluation of pensions in September 2024: are you affected?

The impact on the Solidarity Allowance for the Elderly (ASPA)

A crucial point, often overlooked in official communications, concerns the beneficiaries of theBLADE. This allowance, intended for the most deprived elderly people, could paradoxically decrease following the increase in pensions.

Indeed, the ASPA being calculated according to the retiree's resources, an increase in the basic pension automatically leads to a reduction in the allowance. This situation could create a perverse effect where some retirees ultimately see no improvement in their overall financial situation.

The forgotten ones of revaluation

Despite promising announcements, many retirees find themselves excluded from the revaluation system. Among them:

  • Retirees with incomplete careers
  • Those whose pension slightly exceeds the thresholds set
  • People who have contributed to several retirement plans

Those “forgotten” by the reform often feel wronged, especially since the communication around the revaluation may have created false hopes.

retired with an incomplete careerretired with an incomplete career

Administrative complexity: an obstacle to revaluation

The CNAV (National Old Age Insurance Fund) has recognized delays in the processing of certain files, particularly for pensions prior to 2009. These delays can be explained by the complexity of the calculations and the need to manually process certain files.

This situation highlights the limits of the current system and raises the question of modernizing pension management tools.

The online simulator: a useful but limited tool

To help retirees navigate, Retirement Insurance has set up an online simulator. This tool makes it possible to estimate the amount of the enhanced pension based on the individual situation.

However, this simulator has its limitations. It does not take into account all particular situations and can create expectations that will not necessarily be met in reality.

The future of revaluation: what sustainability?

The revaluation of small pensions is supposed to be renewed and adjusted each year. A new increase is even planned from January 1, 2025. But this promise raises questions:

  • Will the eligibility criteria change?
  • How will this revaluation relate to inflation?
  • Will the budget allocated to this measure be sufficient in the long term?

The debate over the fairness of the retirement system

The revaluation of small pensions, although it responds to a real need, raises the broader question of the fairness of the French retirement system. By targeting only certain profiles of retirees, are we not creating new inequalities?

Some experts are calling for a more global overhaul of the system, which would take into account not only the amount of pensions, but also the cost of living in different regions, atypical career paths, or even the family responsibilities of retirees.

The psychological impact on retirees

Beyond the financial aspects, this situation has a significant psychological impact on retirees. The feeling of being “forgotten” or “left behind” can be a source of anxiety and frustration, especially in a tense economic context.

Retiree associations report an increase in calls from worried or disappointed people, who do not understand why they are not benefiting from the promised increase.

Towards more transparent communication?

The complexity of the revaluation system and the numerous eligibility conditions underline a crucial need for clear and transparent communication from the authorities. Retirees need to understand precisely why they are or are not eligible for this increase.

One avenue for improvement could be the establishment of a dedicated service, capable of explaining individually to each retiree their situation with regard to the revaluation.

READ ALSO: Bad news for the increase in pensions in 2025

Challenges for the future of the retirement system

The current situation highlights the challenges that the French retirement system will face in the years to come:

  • Adapting to increased life expectancy
  • Taking into account increasingly fragmented careers
  • The balance between solidarity and contributoriness
  • Administrative simplification for greater efficiency

These issues will likely require further reforms, hopefully more inclusive and equitable.

A call for citizen vigilance

Faced with the complexity of the system and the issues it raises, it is crucial that citizens, retired or not, remain vigilant and informed. Understanding retirement mechanisms, following legislative developments, and participating in public debate are all ways of contributing to improving the system.

The revaluation of pensions in October 2024 is only one episode in the long history of the French retirement system. It highlights the difficulties in reconciling equity, efficiency and financial sustainability. While the debate on the future of pensions continues to animate French society, it is clear that deep reflections and adjustments will be necessary to guarantee a fair and sustainable system for future generations.

-

-

PREV Tennis live on Flashscore: 11/15/24
NEXT Telesat Corporation Reports Q3 and Nine-Month Financial Results