The International Cycling Union (UCI) warned on Tuesday about carbon monoxide inhalation, a controversial but legal technique used by some of the best runners in the world.
The International Cycling Union (UCI) on Tuesday asked the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) to “take a stand” on inhaling carbon monoxide, a legal but controversial technique used by runners like Tadej Pogacar and Jonas Vingegaard.
“The UCI clearly asks teams and riders not to resort to repeated inhalation of CO. Only the medical use of a single inhalation of CO in a controlled medical environment could be acceptable. The UCI also officially asks the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) to take a position on the use of this method by athletes.indicated the body in a press release at the end of a seminar bringing together the different cycling families for two days in Nice.
Testing the body’s reaction to altitude, according to Pogacar
The use of this potentially lethal gas by at least three cycling teams was revealed last summer during the Tour de France by the specialist site Escape collective. Among these teams are Israel PT as well as the UAE team of Tadej Pogacar, winner of the Tour de France, and Visma of Jonas Vingegaard, his runner-up.
Questioned during the Tour de France by the press, the two champions admitted to using the technique to measure the benefits of training at altitude. “It’s a device to test how your body reacts to altitude, Pogacar explained. We blow into a balloon for one minute for a test that we must do two weeks apart. I only did the first part because for the second, the girl who was supposed to do it never came. It’s not like we breathe that every day.”
In itself, use of this protocol is not illegal. But, in the event of repeated use, its use could be diverted to create artificial hypoxia by artificially creating the effects of effort at altitude. The Movement for Credible Cycling (MPCC), which brings together several teams defending the objective of clean cycling, expressed its concern at the end of October, recommending against “strongly use this technique… pending its ban” in view of his “potentially fatal health risk”.
Swiss
