Attack, criticism, Luis Enrique and Gyökeres

This Friday, November 8, the French press (on the sporting aspect) focused on Saint-Germain's side on classic criticism after a disappointing defeat in the Champions League. Especially for coach Luis Enrique. There is also the possible possibility of Viktor Gyökeres (26-year-old striker), already widely commented on here.

The Parisian –

The Team –

It was necessary to pull in all directions on this PSG which lost, and too bad for the details. Why is Safonov here? Do the counting? Gianluigi Donnarumma (25-year-old goalkeeper) is not at fault for the goals conceded and the Russian still has time.

Nuno Mendes is a frustrating point, since he can contribute offensively. But not everyone can be in front and Achraf Hakimi brings a lot. The Portuguese also covered several early counterattacks. Let's also not forget the injury to Lucas Hernandez, while Lucas Beraldo is not fully establishing himself. Maybe the full-back could be a winger next?

The case of the false 9 joins the transfer window, with only Randal Kolo Muani understudying Gonçalo Ramos with a roughly similar profile. Except that it clearly does not impose itself. You then have to deal with the players present. Ramos is the only real scorer, that's a worry. But how can you play with a real goalscorer if there isn't one? Who should be playing up front right now?

Above all, as for the remark on positional play rather than transition (how can we do that against an Atlético who attacked with few players?), PSG has many opportunities. It's quite unfair to question the game when there is such domination. We do not understand why the environments are mentioned here. But we had to hit hard, Paris has just missed out.

85d73e92fc.jpg1731068243_407_Attack-criticism-Luis-Enr
-

-

PREV Hojbjerg: “De Zerbi is a coach who shows the way”
NEXT Arsenal accelerate for Edu's successor