“Elements that do not meet the criteria of credibility”, Le Figaro obtained the damning report for the complainant

In the report of the psychiatric experts, the version of events of the Argentinian woman who accuses the two French rugby players of rape is seriously called into question.

Postponed several times, the hearing by psychologists of the 39-year-old Argentinian woman who accuses French rugby players Hugo Auradou and Oscar Jegou of rape has taken place. And the report given by these experts, which The Figaro was able to obtain, seriously calls into question the version of events put forward by the complainant and her lawyers. She gives these specialists an account “incoherent”with details “improbable and unreliable”.

In this long expert report, detailed in seven points, the specialists argue that they “detect a tendency to accommodate the information she provides, emphasizing aspects that can favor her vision of the facts and being evasive about data that can compromise her and that clearly leads to establishing a different version.” Pointing the finger “a way of arriving at a view of the facts that gives a partial narrative.”