During this intervention, Bourita revealed that the Kingdom has “concrete data” on Algeria’s intentions to initiate an armed confrontation. According to him, Algiers’ actions “betray a desire for confrontation and rupture”, specifically targeting Morocco in the context of the latter’s recent diplomatic advances on the Sahara issue. These frank and unprecedented statements depart from the usual diplomatic tone and express the seriousness of the moment, marking a break from past approaches of simple communiqués of disapproval.
A context of exacerbated geopolitical rivalries
Morocco perceives this escalation as an attempt to distract Algerians from the country’s internal crises. Since 2019, Algeria has been going through a period of turbulence marked by the Hirak and by increasingly acute socio-economic difficulties. The crisis of shortage of basic necessities and the rise of popular demands have increased the pressure on the Algerian government, which, according to certain observers, is exploiting the Moroccan-Algerian question to stir up nationalist sentiment and thus channel tensions towards “the external enemy.
In his speech on November 6, HM King Mohammed VI highlighted this strategy, denouncing those “who use the Sahara affair as a screen to hide their own domestic problems.” In this sense, the rise in tensions with Morocco could thus constitute an escape route for Algiers, allowing the regime to refocus the public debate around an external threat and to strengthen its own legitimacy.
A double-edged military reinforcement
Since then, Morocco has undertaken a major program to modernize its Royal Armed Forces (FAR), strengthening its defense through new acquisitions of sophisticated equipment and developing a national military industry. This strategic redeployment, initiated to face growing threats, however fuels Algiers’ apprehensions and contributes to the climate of mutual mistrust.
Morocco’s attitude towards its eastern neighbor has always been marked by a policy of “outstretched hand”, despite complex relations and a history of tensions. However, Nasser Bourita’s warnings reflect a shift towards a posture of increased vigilance.