Par
Julien Van Caeyseele
Published on
Oct. 30, 2024 at 6:00 p.m.
See my news
Follow The Republic of Seine et Marne
He took legal action after his exclusion from any higher education establishment for a period of three years. A sanction that he considered “disproportionate.” » The administrative court of Melun ruled on the summary judgment filed by a student from the IEP of Fontainebleau (Seine-et-Marne) who had been notified of the measure by the disciplinary section of the academic council of the University of Paris-est Créteil (Upec).
In emergency
Thus, the courts ultimately rejected his request. He was the subject of this measure following alleged acts of disturbance of public order and assault with physical violence against another student. The events occurred last December, on the sidelines of an IEP blockade to denounce the immigration bill.
The student had requested the emergency suspension of the measure, considering that it “had come at the end of an irregular procedure”, that the disciplinary section had been referred “in a context of violation of equal treatment, or even discrimination against him” and that “the investigation of the case was unfair, partial and non-respectful of the rights of the defense and adversarial rights. »
“Serious doubt”
The IEP's lawyers, for their part, estimated that the emergency condition was not met and that none of the student's arguments were “likely to create serious doubt as to the legality of the decision”
In the order that we were able to consult, the court ruled that in the state of the investigation “none of the means which the applicant mentions […] appears likely to create serious doubt as to the legality of the decision. »
Contacted to find out if he intended to appeal this judgment, the student has not yet responded to our requests. Regardless, there will be a new audience in the coming months anyway. This time it will focus on the substance.
Follow all the news from your favorite cities and media by subscribing to Mon Actu.