Blois Criminal Court
Why does she hate me so much? If his goal was that everyone made my head, it’s won. I no longer have parents and my friends rejected me. In a sob, N. placed at the helm a piece of years of anxiety, punctuated by a suicide attempt.
In 2020, his company in the Vendômois was the subject of accusations on alleged financial offenses and in the Labor Code, accompanied by reports to the competent organizations which do not take long to investigate. Slanderous denunciations made by usurping the name of an employee.
A few months later, this time it is the intimate sphere of N. that shatters. The same crow sends letters to the couple and especially to their loved ones in which S., his companion, is accused of rape on her minor daughter-in-law, with photos of the latter, in suggestive poses or naked breasts.
“A woman of great perversity”
Other intimate photos are revealed around the anatomy of S. These shots could only be sent to one person: this virtual mistress with whom he recently dialogues on the Internet.
Behind this false “Marie Lefèvre”, the investigators go up the trace of a certain C., who now shares his life with the ex-companion of N. “I created a false account to spy on the couple and I came back in relation to S.”she confessed to the police.
His absence at the hearing of April 28, 2025 added a little mystery to this affair, worthy of a bad Vaudeville but with the repercussions comparable to a « tsunami » For the lawyer of S., continued for the dissemination of images of a sexual nature of his daughter-in-law. “He suffered the most odious slanderous denunciations. They had to leave the region. It is a descent into abyssal hell because of a woman of great perversity who is in a provocation to the offense ”describes me Damien wine.
The daughter-in-law of S. has denied “All relationships” with him. The fact remains that the stepfather broadcast photos of the teenager “In lascivious poses” According to the court, sometimes without her knowledge, (not to mention this shot where she is seen naked breasts). “She took her to send her to her boyfriend but she stayed on my phone, which she used”said, ashamed, the fifties, fell into the nets of this “Virtual mistress. She asked me for photos of my daughter-in-law. I have fun on this. I didn’t think we would have gotten there. But I am not a pervert ”he defended himself.
Two pronounced penalties
Faced with this “Settlement of accounts in an unhealthy context”the vice-prosecutor Jean Dematteis asked for the same sentence for the two defendants: six months of single and a € 1,500 fine. While regretting that S. does not present “No analysis, awareness or excuse” On sending intimate photos, of him and the minor girl. “He does it without thinking. It’s dismaying. »»
The few avenues of explanation were finally revealed by the lawyer for the crow, unknown to justice. “I do not excuse his behavior”started Me Jean-François Mortelette, anxious to make understand how she arrived “At this end”. Pell-mell, he quotes “Violence” committed in the past by N. on C.’s companion, when they were in a relationship. Or even “False in signature”of the “Malicious phone calls” To explain, in response, these “Extremely unpleasant things” Made by his client.
At the end of the deliberation, the latter was sentenced to twelve months suspended prison sentence and € 1,500 fine, while S. received six months in prison with single and € 500 fine.
