Parti Quebecois | Count

There are people who have all the talents in life, so much that it becomes indecent.

Take for example the new PQ deputy for Terrebonne, Catherine Gentilcore, which, moreover, I did not know existence to her election.

Well ! Know that we are visibly dealing there with a gifted, with a rare precocity, so much so that only 19 days after her election, she was already able to give a political lesson to an old guy like me, published on the website of the website Montreal Journal^⁠1and relayed by his chief on social networks.

The written writing: “Mr. Labeaume, not to hold a referendum amounts to losing it ». Reading the book The Labeaume Code, She says she was “hit” by a sentence where I write that “I will never agree with a suicide bomber” approach “ concerning a possible third referendum.

On reading, we could even be in Torieu and think that Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, PSPP, watched the copy over the shoulder of his author.

Once the text is digested, I reflected that having had the chance to know M^me Gentlecore earlier, I might have succeeded in my career.

But when she writes “I hope you can better” refer to my statement, an incredible feeling of mediocrity invaded me. Hard, hard! By digging, I found the explanation of my disarray, my mother had already scolded me, child, using roughly the same words …

And how to blame him for the fact that instead of deepening her thinking about the content of the book, as for sovereignty, she rather chose to connect together to make believe that PSPP is a victim and is pity.

Misery ! This man is in the process of paying a nasty reputation as a short -skinned politician, whose propensity for irritability shows up a little more every day, and annoys.

Like any goalkeeper of experience, he would have the advantage of being hit by the washer more often, instead of trying to constantly fight with it, at the risk of counting for its purpose.

If I were him, I would analyze what is currently happening to Pierre Poilievre, who already saw his name at the top of the poster, as Prime Minister, and who takes a cursed land.

And it may also have an benefit in taking a private course in political finesse by Yves-François Blanchet.

Quebecers will not want to give the mandate to create a new country to a guy who feels persecuted.

Two or three considerations on what would be my crimes, according to M^me Gentilcore.

So imagine that after having voted yes to the two referendums on sovereignty, and know that in my family we have a lot wet the shirt in both cases, I worry that the PQ is handling their hands by winning to trigger a third, absolutely, in a first mandate of government, a hypothesis without strategic.

M^me Gentlecore judges that what I express is “out of fear of the challenges of independence”.

Another good lesson for me, who should know how to eat the courage of those, like her, I suppose, who have lived so much, and so much fought …

Nevertheless, on the planet where I live, the concerns that I hear around me do not necessarily correspond to a sovereignist emergency.

Above all, I hear that PSPP is appreciated and that we would like, for the least sovereignist, that he has the room for maneuver on the question of the triggering of a third referendum, because they would like it as the next Prime Minister, and for others, more sovereignist, that he does not immediately commit to the moment of this trigger, because they see a strategic error.

Yes, the head of the PQ is considered honest in his approach by not hiding this objective of referendum ballot in a first mandate, but we can also believe that if he had not engaged in this way, he would never have been elected head of the PQ.

Well, too bad for him if his political career depends on this stubbornness, but this career does not matter, compared to the idea of ​​the country.

A party leader who passes, like others, is absolutely nothing compared to the potential damage of a Kamikaze decision based on the precept used by the deputy that “not holding a referendum amounts to losing it”.

This is exactly the kind of political posture that can lead to disaster for Quebec, decide to take absolutely another referendum in a first mandate of government, even if the chance to win it could be objectively too thin, as thin as the epidermis of PSPP.

1. Read the letter from Catherine Gentilcore in The Montreal Journal

What do you think? Take part in the dialogue