Yoon’s impeachment before South Korean constitutional court

Yoon’s impeachment before South Korean constitutional court
Yoon’s impeachment before South Korean constitutional court

Keystone-SDA

South Korea’s constitutional court held its first meeting on Monday to discuss the timetable for impeachment proceedings against Yoon Suk-yeol, the president ousted by parliament for his failed attempt to impose martial law. She has six months to decide.

This content was published on

December 16, 2024 – 04:41

(Keystone-ATS) If the court validates Parliament’s decision to impeach the South Korean president, adopted Saturday evening by 204 votes to 85, Mr. Yoon will be deposed and a presidential election must be held within two months. The winner will be invested the day after the result, without the usual transition period.

During this period of up to eight months, Prime Minister Han Duck-soo will act as interim minister. In his first words as temporary leader, he pledged to do everything possible to guarantee “stable governance”.

Little doubt about the outcome

The president of the constitutional court, Moon Hyung-bae, promised shortly after the vote a “speedy and fair procedure”. The court normally has nine judges, but three retired in October without being replaced, due to the political deadlock in the country. Six votes being required to ratify an impeachment, a unanimous judgment will be necessary to dismiss Yoon Suk-yeol.

But according to most experts, there is little doubt about the outcome, as the violations of the constitution and the law accused of Mr. Yoon are blatant.

Opposition leader Lee Jae-myung said on Sunday that a quick decision was “the only way to limit the national unrest and alleviate the suffering of the people.” A political star entangled in affairs that could cost him his eligibility, Mr. Lee is a favorite among analysts in the event of a new election. In 2022, he lost to Mr. Yoon by the narrowest margin in South Korean history.

Lee Jae-myung was convicted in November of violating election laws, but the verdict was stayed. If convicted, he would no longer be able to appear. If, however, he were elected before the decision, the proceedings would be interrupted, due to presidential immunity.

Investigation for “rebellion”

Yoon Suk-yeol stunned the country by declaring martial law by surprise on the night of December 3 to 4 and sending the army to Parliament to prevent it from sitting, before reversing course barely six hours later under pressure from the National Assembly and demonstrators.

The leader of his People’s Power Party (PPP), Han Dong-hoon, announced his resignation at a press conference on Monday, offering his “sincere apologies to all those who suffered due to martial law.” Mr. Han had publicly supported the impeachment motion. “I still don’t regret” his adoption, he assured.

The unpopular deposed leader, 63, is also under criminal investigation for “rebellion”, a crime theoretically punishable by death. He no longer has the right to leave the country. The former star prosecutor “refused” to appear in court on Sunday, with prosecutors announcing that they would summon him a second time.

“Leader of the Rebellion”

If his dismissal was confirmed, he would become the second South Korean president officially removed from office, after Park Geun-hye in 2017. For Ms. Park, who was charged with corruption, the court ratified Parliament’s decision 92 days after its vote.

There is, however, a reverse precedent. In March 2004, MPs also adopted an impeachment motion against Roh Moo-hyun, but it was invalidated two months later by the constitutional court.

North Korea, which has been trickling its reactions since the start of the unrest in its neighbor, on Monday described Yoon Suk-yeol as “leader of the rebellion”, according to the official KCNA agency. As usual, Mr. Yoon has also been called a “puppet” by the North Korean state media, which considers him to be under the thumb of the United States of America.

-

-

PREV South Korea | Constitutional Court launches review of impeachment of deposed president
NEXT Faced with controversies surrounding drones observed in the United States, the Minister of Internal Security reassures