Donald Trump trial judge postpones sentencing until September 18

Donald Trump trial judge postpones sentencing until September 18
Donald Trump trial judge postpones sentencing until September 18

This decision considerably lightens the judicial calendar of the candidate for the White House in the immediate future. Because the sentence, which can be up to four years in prison, was initially to be pronounced four days before the Republican convention in Milwaukee.

The sentencing in Donald Trump’s criminal trial for concealed payments to a porn star, scheduled for mid-July, has been postponed until September 18, a first effect of the Supreme Court’s heavy decision on the former president of the United States’ immunity.

“The sentencing date of July 11 is (…) annulled,” and “adjourned to September 18 if still necessary,” approximately six weeks before the date of the American presidential election, November 5, 2024, announced New York Magistrate Juan Merchan in a decision notified to the parties and made public on Tuesday.

A consequence of a Supreme Court decision

Judge Merchan, who presided over Donald Trump’s trial in April and May, the first criminal trial of a former US president, made his decision hours after the Manhattan prosecutor’s office said it was open to a postponement.

On Monday, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision, Donald Trump’s lawyers wrote to the judge to ask for the annulment of the historic verdict delivered on May 30 by a unanimous jury: the former president of the United States had been found guilty of 34 crimes of falsifying accounting records to hide from voters the payment of $130,000 to porn star Stormy Daniels, at the very end of the 2016 presidential campaign.

On his social network Truth Social, the Republican billionaire immediately reacted by assuring in capital letters that this is a “total exoneration”, while the judge has absolutely not ruled on the substance of the request.

The defense had already invoked its immunity in vain to derail part of the case. But for the lawyers, the decision handed down the day before by the conservative-majority Supreme Court, according to which the President of the United States “is entitled to at least a presumption of immunity for his official acts”, reshuffles the cards.

“During the trial and its closing arguments, the prosecution placed a highly prejudicial emphasis on evidence derived from official acts, such as testimony about events that occurred in the Oval Office (…) social media posts (on Donald Trump’s accounts as president) and records of phone calls involving Donald Trump while he was in office in 2017,” they argue in a preparatory document for their appeal, made public on Tuesday.

The Manhattan prosecutor’s office said the arguments “are unfounded” but did not oppose consideration of the request.

Most read

-

-

PREV Jordan’s must-have sneakers are on sale these days
NEXT To lower electricity prices, the next government will have to change the rules