Emmanuel Macron with Kamel Daoud. DR
By Karim B. – The French president has not yet recovered from the monumental fiasco he suffered during the France-Israel match when he suffered a second shame with the discovery of the imposture of his friend Kamel Daoud. The revelation made by the victim of terrorism, whose drama the Goncourt Prize used to weave the plot of his novel, should, unless there is complicity on the part of those responsible for this formerly literary but now political distinction, be sanctioned by pure and simple withdrawal. of this and its banishment from bookstores.
According to the testimony of the survivor of a massacre committed by savage hordes, the latter was the victim of a violation of medical confidentiality, since she was followed by the wife of the author, a psychiatrist by profession. The imposture is therefore not limited to the simple fact of having used the torture of this unfortunate lady who escaped death by miracle, but it takes the form of a very serious criminal offense punishable by the courts. It is, moreover, very possible that the victim of this serious crime will file a complaint before the Algerian or even French courts, since the incriminated book was published in France.
This affair not only affects Kamel Daoud and his wife, but also his publisher and the Goncourt institution, as well as President Macron, who appeared on several occasions alongside the recently naturalized Algerian “writer”, notably during his trip to Oran, where his host served as his guide and greatly contributed to the preparation of the official program of his visit. Which did not lead him to the Museum of the Glorious Algerian Armed Revolution, but to a raï publisher.
Algeriapatriotic has never ceased to alert public opinion to the hypocrisy of the nostalgic circles of French Algeria and the instigators of “who kills who”, who have placed on a pedestal the former columnist of a daily newspaper appearing in Oran, whose writings corresponded to the anti-Algerian and Islamophobic policy skillfully maintained in France. We notably revealed the true level of this shoddy writer that the editor-in-chief of our site unmasked. She informed him of her mediocrity by sending him back one of her articles redacted at 80% in red, pointing out monumental mistakes that a primary school student would not commit.
Cornered, Kamel Daoud replied that the newspaper was wrong and had published the uncorrected version. Our national “Proust” did not realize that by responding in this way he was confirming that what readers discovered in the Algerian newspaper at the time, and are currently discovering in his novels, are completely reworked and rewritten texts. . What matters for Gallimard editions and the literary pseudo-critics and other hosts of French TV shows is not the literary value of the works to which they provide publicity bordering on sublimation, but the objective which is assigned by the Consent Makers, disciples of Edward Barnays.
K. B.
