Jean-Charles Lajoie, long seen as an essential figure in Quebec sports journalism, today seems on the edge of the precipice.
The recent catastrophic ratings revealed by Maxime Truman leave little room for interpretation: 22,000 spectators on average for his show “JiC”, which is barely better than community TV standards.
For TVA Sports, already in the midst of a financial collapse, this situation is unsustainable.
Lajoie, despite being the highest paid sports journalist in Quebec, with a salary of around $400,000 per year, has become a symbol of Quebecor’s excesses and strategic errors.
With a concrete contract that runs until 2026, he seems assured of his income. But the question remains: at what cost for TVA Sports?
With each passing day, his show embodies more the weight of a media system that is running out of steam.
For several years, Jean-Charles Lajoie has had a reputation as a polarizing figure, both in his opinions and in his professional relationships.
RNC Média, Lajoie’s former employer at BPM Sports, was forced to buy out his contract for the modest sum of $500,000 after unbearable internal tensions.
Station employees had come to the front to demand his departure, citing a work climate that had become toxic under his leadership.
This costly takeover, far from being a rebirth, rather confirmed a downward trajectory.
At TVA Sports, Lajoie continued to fuel the controversy with sensationalist statements which, although loud, were never enough to attract a large audience.
Worse still, his passage coincided with the chain’s financial descent into hell.
To try to save the furniture, Lajoie would have received explicit orders from his bosses: adopt an even more sensationalist tone, even if it means flirting with disinformation.
This pressure gave rise to incredible declarations, such as the fictitious announcement of the resignation of Martin St-Louis or that of the move of CF Montreal to Detroit.
These media stunts, supposed to create excitement, instead turned into ridicule. The public, fed up with these artifices, did not respond.
Forced to retract, Lajoie tried to minimize his remarks by accusing his detractors of being “scavengers”. But the damage was done: the credibility of his show hit rock bottom.
Lajoie always refused to look in the mirror. This is why he keeps going backwards instead of moving forward.
The story of Jean-Charles Lajoie is closely linked to that of TVA Sports, a channel losing speed and relevance.
The figures speak for themselves: since its creation in 2011, TVA Sports has accumulated nearly $300 million in losses.
Just in 2023, TVA Sports lost 115,000 subscribers, or 9 percent of its audience. In 2024, it will be even worse according to what is circulating.
Flagship shows, like JiC, no longer attract. Canadiens matches, once the jewel of the program, are struggling to exceed 400,000 spectators, far from the peaks reached a few years ago.
Meanwhile, RDS consolidates its dominance thanks to respected figures like Pierre Houde and Marc Denis.
Jean-Charles Lajoie despite himself embodies the strategic errors and the growing disconnection of TVA Sports with its public.
Where animators like Stephen A. Smith in the United States justify their exorbitant salaries by their ability to captivate millions of spectators, Lajoie represents a disproportionate investment for microscopic audiences.
Its ability to “surf” on its reputation to garner juicy contracts testifies as much to its opportunism as to the shortcomings of the industry.
But as the ratings crumble, it becomes increasingly clear that Lajoie cost far more than it brought in.
With the announced loss of NHL rights in 2026, TVA Sports is heading towards a major restructuring, or even a complete closure.
Lajoie’s show, already on an artificial respirator, will probably not survive this deadline. And even if his contract protects him until that date, it is a safe bet that TVA Sports will seek to minimize his airtime to limit losses.
For Quebecor, the equation is simple: Jean-Charles Lajoie costs too much for such poor results.
But beyond the financial question, his case highlights the structural challenges of a channel which has never managed to find its place in a constantly evolving media landscape.
Jean-Charles Lajoie, once considered a major asset, has today become a symbol of the decline of TVA Sports.
If his television performance does not improve, his departure from the airwaves could be precipitated well before 2026.
But the problem goes well beyond Lajoie: it is Quebecor’s entire media empire, weakened by colossal financial losses and questionable strategic choices, which is at stake.
For TVA Sports, the time has come for survival. And for Jean-Charles Lajoie, the reality is brutal: the end is near.
TVA Sports, once presented as a major player in the Quebec media universe, today resembles a real country club, where extravagant spending and questionable decisions follow one another with no recovery in sight.
While the chain has posted astronomical losses since 2011, its management practices demonstrate a glaring lack of rigor and a total disconnection with financial reality.
The case of Jean-Charles Lajoie, with his solid gold contract of 400,000 dollars per year, is only the tip of the iceberg.
TVA Sports seems to have adopted an excessive remuneration policy for several of its “star figures”, hoping to attract audiences which, in reality, never came.
And yet, these animators continue to benefit from luxurious working conditions, with generous contracts and disproportionate production budgets.
The approach seems more like a desperate attempt to maintain a veneer of prestige than a viable media strategy.
According to internal sources, TVA Sports employees benefit from generous bonuses, even when the channel’s performance is catastrophic.
Bonuses for paltry ratings, excessive travel costs and senseless expense management are among the many points of criticism.
Anecdotes abound about first-class travel to cover sporting events, brand-new studios that often go unused, and expensive but ineffective advertising campaigns.
All this, even as the chain continues to post record losses. A former executive reportedly confided:
“TVA Sports is like a ruined poker player who bets everything he has left on a losing hand. We’re burning money we don’t have. »
The lack of strategic vision at the top of TVA Sports is glaring. Pierre-Karl Péladeau, president of Quebecor, himself seems disillusioned by the financial pit that the sports channel has become.
Since 2014, the number of TVA Sports subscribers has fallen from 1.8 million to less than a million in 2024, a massive collapse that reflects both the channel’s failure to retain its audience and the impact of general cable churn.
This critical situation forced TVA Group to borrow $91 million from its main shareholder, Quebecor Media, just to balance its budget.
Worse still, TVA’s bank credit line was reduced to only 20 million, while it fluctuated between 75 and 150 million over the last decade.
This credit crunch is a clear warning signal: TVA Sports is a toxic investment.
The content of TVA Sports proves this financial and strategic disorganization. The broadcasts, once designed to compete with those of RDS, are now dominated by sensationalist opinions, often to the detriment of quality sports analysis.
Shows like those of Jean-Charles Lajoie, where absurd statements and wild predictions take precedence over information, have contributed to degrading the channel’s image.
Rather than establishing itself as a credible reference for sports fans, TVA Sports looks like a desperate media outlet chasing plummeting audiences.
TVA Sports’ main problem lies in its inability to evolve with new media consumption habits.
While streaming platforms, such as Prime Video, Apple TV and Netflix, now dominate the landscape, TVA Sports clings to an outdated and expensive model that no longer attracts younger generations.
At the same time, investments in expensive media figures like Jean-Charles Lajoie or Élizabeth Rancourt, Renaud Lavoie, Patrick Laline, Félix Séguin, Maxim Lapierre and company, combined with a loss of control over exclusive broadcasting rights, show that the channel failed to anticipate major changes in the industry.
With Bell and RDS now allied with Prime Video, TVA Sports seems to be a disarmed army facing a media war that it cannot win.
Barring a financial or strategic miracle, TVA Sports will not survive until 2026, when its contract for NHL rights ends.
This deadline could mark the complete disappearance of the chain, allowing Quebecor to cut its losses and refocus its efforts on its other divisions.
Jean-Charles Lajoie, for his part, is almost guaranteed to see his show disappear from the airwaves well before this date.
At $400,000 a year, it costs too much for a chain drowning in debt. And if TVA Sports were to close its doors, Lajoie could well be the last nail in the coffin of a channel that has never been able to find its place.
The TVA Sports case, and more specifically that of Jean-Charles Lajoie, is a brutal lesson in the dangers of media management based on the short term and sensationalism.
By wanting to play the big game without any real strategy, Quebecor has transformed its sports channel into a financial pit.
For the public, the observation is clear: quality and credibility matter more than noise and spectacle.
TVA Sports failed to meet this expectation, and the consequences are now inevitable.
The “country club” that the channel has become will soon no longer have the means for its excess.
The end is near. Jean-Charles Lajoie knows it. Pierre-Karl Péladeau knows it.
An end…inevitable…