At a time when the leaders of Olympique de Marseille regularly shout in plot after disputed arbitral decisions, Pascal Dupraz considers that the Marseille club is one of those clubs which cannot be disadvantaged.
Is there a great conspiracy of French football against Olympique de Marseille? This is what leaders and many Olympian supporters think today. In question, recent arbitral decisions that have created several controversies. The latest, the expulsion of Medhi Benatia at the time of his own defeat in the 16th round of the French Cup against LOSC on January 14. Several days later, the feeling of disadvantage felt in the Marseille camp continues to debate. At the microphone of RMC, Pascal Dupraz considers that OM is nevertheless part of this caste of large French clubs which have nothing to fear from French arbitration, which is considered honest.
“It was debated because it's OM”
« The referees, whatever we say, have improved a lot. They worked a lot. They have a tool today that they do not exploit well enough. But this is my feeling. Do not tell me that Harit did not deserve to be expelled against PSG, but it made the front page, it was debated because it is OM. Why will that have no impact? Because first of all, I really believe in the honesty of the referees. Then because it's part of the great football circus. It's not good, I agree, when I am in the technical zone, I am often unbearable for the referees. It's hard to control, but we should control ourselves. OM is second and is a big club. If there is a big club that will not be disadvantaged by the referees, it is OM “Said Pascal Dupraz during the program” Les Grandes Gueules du Sport “broadcast on RMC.
-The former coach of Toulouse, ASSE or SM Caen defeated Marion Bartoli in a debate during which he considers that there is no plot against OM.