Pwhy this complaint for slanderous denunciation?
Today, we are sacrificing a man, pinning him to the pillory, we are overwhelming him with all the evils. We note that Florian Grill, the president of the FFR, recalled during his trip to Argentina this summer (in the context of the Jegou-Auradou affair) a fundamental principle of our law which is the presumption of innocence. Obviously, here, regarding Stéphane Cambos, he has forgotten it. However, it is not up to the president of the FFR to assert justice.
So, in your opinion, is the investigation oriented?
It is more than oriented! In fact, this investigation is not one. When we carry out investigations into a tragedy like this, we inspect everything that went wrong. The president of the FFR says he was unable to go to the family’s bedside in South Africa. In truth, it was necessary to save the image of Private Grill. What’s more serious: a child has disappeared. His family is waiting for the truth and it is not a sum of lies that makes the truth. We see this through the FFR report which does not address angry subjects.
It is not up to the president of the FFR to say justice”
What are these angry subjects?
Stéphane Cambos, who is given the title of manager of the French U18 team, was informed the day before or two days before of his appointment and his departure for South Africa. This without the slightest mission letter which frames his functions. He later discovered the existence of a mission order which was not submitted for his signature and in which it is written that security issues are the responsibility of his superior, the DTN.
The report remains vague on the circumstances of the tragedy of August 7. What does your customer say?
First, we must ask ourselves who established the program for this tour. It is produced by the federation with the tour operator. On August 5, a meeting took place between the staff and the tour operator to discuss the program for the following two days. Some people have floated the idea of having a cool down session in the water. What was recorded and noted in the schedule to which the FFR has access via computer sharing: the session should have taken place at the end of the excursion to the hotel. Is there any objective element in the file ensuring that the manager gave an order contrary to the program? No. Stéphane Cambos would have been told when faced with his reluctance, “you are too careful”. A point on which the report does not dwell: Stéphane Cambos and Robin Ladauge, the physical trainer, are at the same hierarchical level, they are both national technical executives, and have no hierarchical dependence on one another. other. If the preparer has decided, and it is the criminal investigation which will have to determine this, to take latitudes with the established program, it is his responsibility.
Stéphane Cambos would have been told when faced with his reluctance, “you are too careful”
Arnaud Dupin denounces an investigation carried out by the Federation and its president Florian Grill.
Thierry David / SOUTH WEST
Where was Stéphane Cambos when he launched into the water at Dias Beach?
Stéphane Cambos never took his young people to the beach. The only ones he supervised were those he took to the Cape Point Lighthouse. This truth does not appear anywhere. However, it was when he saw that the swim had been organized without his knowledge that he went down to the beach. It was at this moment that the physical trainer and those who were around stopped this session. Here again, this does not appear in the report: if the swimming stops when Stéphane Cambos intervenes, it is because he did not agree with what happened. We know the rest: when he comes out of the water, he notices that two young people are in great difficulty. He is criticized for not having jumped into the water, for not going there. When you have young people in the water 20 meters away, either you are a lifeguard with the appropriate equipment, or you do like Stéphane Cambos and you hurry to go to the first aid station and sound the alert. Stéphane Cambos’ statements have been completely ignored. This report is insignificant and scandalous. Another unanswered question: how did people who took photos of the swim from the beach not intervene to stop it? Why is this not included in the report? Once again, we are not telling the truth to Medhi Narjissi’s family.
If the swimming stops when Stéphane Cambos intervenes, it is because he did not agree with what he is doing”
You are very harsh towards the FFR…
She sought to provide support to the Ministry of Sports so that it could take sanctions. In its report, the FFR questions the conditions of organization of this session while indicating that Stéphane Cambos was aware of the dangers of Dias Beach. This amounts to designating him responsible for the disappearance of Medhi Narjissi. This is called an execution. This is unsustainable. How can you write such a thing? In a normal structure, who is criminally responsible? It’s not the employee. He’s the boss.
In a normal structure, who is criminally responsible? It’s not the employee. He’s the boss.
