Justice
Article reserved for subscribers
Sentences of eighteen months suspended to sixteen years in prison were requested this Monday, December 16 by the national anti-terrorism prosecution, which notably abandoned complicity in assassination for the killer's two childhood friends, arousing ire lawyers for the civil parties.
It was first necessary to justify the series of requalifications that would follow. “To accuse is to ensure, without weakness but without excess, the individualized repression of the crimes committed by each person. To accuse is to seek the incrimination not necessarily the highest but the fairest. immediately clarified the attorney general, Nicolas Braconnay, first of the two-headed prosecution to launch. At the end of a day dissecting the charges against the eight accused referred to the specially composed Paris Assize Court for their involvement in the scheme leading to the assassination of Samuel Paty, the national anti-terrorism prosecutor's office (Pnat) requested sentences ranging from eighteen months suspended to sixteen years of criminal imprisonment. By requesting the downward reclassification of part of the charges.
Given the family's expectations and the media hype, it was first necessary to take an essential law course. Faced with a crowded room, the attorney general differentiated the head of “complicity in assassination