This fiery debate divides 1 million fans: Was Sauron too terrifying to appear on screen?

The “Lord of the Rings” film trilogy has captivated millions of fans around the world with its epic depiction of the struggle between good and evil. However, one point still arouses passionate debate among fans of the saga: the physical absence of Sauron, the main antagonist. Although his evil influence is omnipresent, the absence of his material form in the film intrigues and divides fans. Why does such a central character remain invisible? This question raises questions about the narrative and artistic choices of Peter Jackson, the director, and the original intentions of JRR Tolkien, the author of the books.

Why don't we see Sauron in his physical form?

In “The Lord of the Rings”, Sauron is mainly represented by his menacing Eye, always on the lookout, watching over Middle-earth from his tower at Barad-dûr. This symbolic representation of Sauron highlights his omniscience and his ability to control his armies without ever physically appearing.

A popular theory among fans is that Tolkien wanted to maintain a work accessible to all ages. Indeed, Sauron, in his physical form, might have been too scary for younger audiences. The battle scenes and confrontations with his servants, such as the Nazgûl, are enough to convey the terror he inspires.

Another view suggests that showing Sauron as a man would lessen his impact. Like Darth Vader, whose power lies largely in his mystery and menacing appearance, Sauron could lose his presence if he were shown as a mere mortal.

The origins of Sauron according to “The Rings of Power”

The “Rings of Power” series explores the origin of Sauron and his evolution as a dark lord. This prequel series offers insight into his rise and the human sacrifices he orchestrated in Númenor for his master Morgoth.

This exploration of his origins adds an extra dimension to the character, making him even scarier. Understanding the atrocious acts committed by Sauron enriches our perception of his threateven if it is not necessarily visible on the screen.

The choice not to show Sauron in his physical form in the trilogy could therefore be an artistic decision, aimed at maintaining the mystery and focusing on the consequences of his actions rather than on his person. This approach allows us to highlight his servants, like the Nazgûl, who serve as an extension of his will..

Sauron and the Nazgûl: an extension of his will

The Nazgûl, or wraiths of the ring, are emblematic figures of the terror that Sauron inspires. These nine human kings, corrupted by the power of the rings, became devoted servants, virtually indestructible and entirely submissive to the will of Sauron.

Here's how to become a video editing pro: all our advice

Their presence in the film more than compensates for Sauron's physical absence. These black riders embody the constant and oppressive threat of their masterrelentlessly pursuing Frodo and his companions.

By focusing attention on the Nazgûl, the film manages to convey the idea that Sauron is everywhere, even if he is never physically present. This reinforces the idea that Sauron is not just a physical being, but an omnipresent evil force that looms over Middle-earth..

The power of the Eye of Sauron

The Eye of Sauron is one of the most memorable depictions of his power. Although it is only a symbol, it is enough to embody the threat he poses. The Eye is constantly searching for the One Ring, and its ability to see almost everything in Middle-earth makes it a formidable foe.

This visual representation of Sauron allows the viewer to feel his presence without physically seeing him. The Eye of Sauron becomes a character in its own rightan entity that inspires fear and respect through its mere existence.

Tolkien's view of Sauron

JRR Tolkien's vision of Sauron was of an ancient evil, an evil that is not limited to physical actions, but seeps into minds and hearts. Tolkien conceived Sauron as a threat beyond mere physical confrontation.

In his letters, Tolkien explains that Sauron is a complex character, whose influence is more psychological than physical. He is the symbol of corruption, of absolute power which corrupts absolutely. His presence in history is an allegory of the dangers of the thirst for power and excessive ambition.

By choosing not to show Sauron in physical form, Peter Jackson respects this vision, allowing viewers to focus on the impacts of his actions and the characters' inner struggle against the evil influence of the Ring.

Ultimately, the absence of Sauron as a visible character in the films raises the question of the importance of the representation of evil in works of fiction. Is it more effective to show an antagonist physically, or can their presence be even more powerful when felt through other means? This question remains open and continues to divide fans around the world.

Did you like it? 4.6/5 (23)