The minutes of silence organized In tribute to Aboubakar Cissé, killing stabs in a mosquein the National Assembly and in the Senate are controversial. Yaël Braun-Pivet is accused of having procrastinated. As for Gérard Larcher, he is criticized for having associated several victims in his speech.
However, these controversies are unnecessary. Do you think that our dead will return by multiplying the minutes of silence in the National Assembly and the Senate? Minutes made by paralyzed politicians at the idea of missing a victim and having to face a media storm.
We must see these policies getting lost in inconsistency. Yaël Braun-Pivet who is slow to pay tribute to Aboubakar Cissé, Gérard Larcher who seems to make a lot of victims, bringing together the girl stabbed from Nantes, the rabbi attacked in Orleans and the young Muslim killed in the mosque, as if to grant a victim to each community.
“Circumstance tears”
The will is above all not accused of sorting it, of prioritizing them. Except that is what we do. Why honor a victim and not another? Why not honor another? Why choose three rather than one? So the poison of the poison of suspicion and the division which returns.
What the families of the victims expect is not the tears of crocodiles of parliamentarians, but that justice is done. The respect we owe to society as a whole is to ensure that these hateful crimes concerning Muslims, Jews, Catholics, women, gays, trans, teachers, nurses, police, firefighters, penitentiary staff never arrive. These tears of circumstance badly hide the inability to prevent these murders.
Read more
