But when the police asked him to produce the judgment ordering this expulsion as is usually the case, the man obviously could not produce it. And for good reason, this judgment does not exist …
The bailiff sublets an apartment located in a house on avenue Batta. He decided to expel the tenant, make the apartment empty and place a new lock at the door during the absence of the tenant.
The septuagenarian challenged the facts.
“I had an apartment occupied and invaded by squatters, dealers“Said the defendant before the court.”My tenant was still domiciled there, but was never present. I wanted to expel squatters. I was asked to send a letter what I did. I asked for the police intervention to expel people. I did not receive a police response. The day said and the time said, I phoned the police and I was told that we were going to send someone. I defended my physical integrity by expelling squatters.“
According to the bailiff, it was his partner who perceived the tenant’s rents and squatters adopted dangerous behavior. “”They were going to look for fir pallets that they burned and risked setting fire to the building. There was the mother of my partner, a lady over 80 years old who lived there.“
-“There must have been a communication problem”
“I am accused of having expelled myself when I should have done a civil procedure. But when I ask the police as a human to come and help me for an expulsion, it is made in a precise form. There must have been a communication problem. I should have been to the justice of the peace. I am aware of the procedure.“
“We truncated the investigation. I did not act as a Huissier. I am an individual who wanted to put squatters outside.“
The tenant’s property administrator called for a total of 3,150 euros.
The defense lawyer pleaded for acquittal for a state of necessity.
