Admittedly, the common one is quite customary of this kind of thing and, fundamentally, it did nothing illegal by sharing this information. Nevertheless, this lady is an elected representative, let us remember, her party’s leader of the municipal council, moreover. As such, the sharing of such information has something to ask questions. Elected officials, whether or not they want it, must still present exemplary behavior. But to say that today seems sometimes almost exceeded, misunderstood, even insulting for some.
At the Mr de Charleroi, it is to the one who will kill the other
Take another road
The Belgian Institute for Road Safety (VIAS) has also annoyed, with our colleagues from Sudpresse, the attitude of the Liberal elected official. “”She must understand that these police checks are carried out, not to annoy people but in order to improve road safety and save lives. In our building, we host the ASBL Parents of children victims of the road. They know that alcohol can destroy lives. If she is a mother, she thinks about it! With the alert it has broadcast, drivers will continue to drink and have taken another road. “
Obviously, the elected representative of Binche, 1st deputy for the MR list in Hainaut during the June 2024 election, does not care as his first cooked. If she still removed the publication, she does not understand the trial made to her. But why then have you removed this publication? She considers that it is in no way a fault and, that in her eyes, it is the same as to report an obstacle on the road in the GPS and collaborative Waze application. She also wonders what is the difference between publishing this information on her social networks or in a WhatsApp group – an instant messaging application – with knowledge? We want to answer her that on networks, her publication being public, she does not have the same status as on a private network.
Have anything to do with 1.6 million euros in European funds to destroy a 16th century farm?
When our colleagues tell her that by doing this, it allows soaked drivers to choose another road and thus avoid being checked, she responds with a certain cheek that it is a “interpretation” from the journalist. Why share it then, if not to allow certain indelicate drivers or drivers to blow in the ball (which is not one)? As if the one, who saw this publication still decided to go through there, being in a state of alcoholic impregnation.
The miracle asphalt will not repair the nests-in-gowl of the Walloon motorways
Irresponsible?
At a time when a bunch of people that could be described as stem, soaked or not, continue to drive too quickly in the agglomerations, race on the highway or filming speeding, convinced that it can happen nothing, this type of behavior on the part of one or an elected representable?
And when you are a lawyer and a member of a party participating in the Walloon government with the aim of acting “on prevention and awareness, specifically with regard to the three main causes of accident (conduct under influence, speed and distraction) “do we not have the duty to be impeccable on this question?
The recovery of Wallonia will also go through the possibility that each will have to heat up correctly
You can of course be elected and have a private life alongside politics, a life with a family and friends. People we might like to avoid getting trouble. It is human and in no way questionable. But publishing it publicly on a social network is a way of showing voters, and undoubtedly others on which one is eyeing for the future, that one is an elected representative. But to be too helpful do we not become a clientelist, even populist? Really, there is no other word.
