Eric Dosogne admits that he has never hidden his “sympathies” To hunt it and he adds: “Without compromising as a socialist on respect for human rights and respect for all minorities”. Over the years, he has returned there several times “Always related to my alderman skills and with the sole objective of maintaining relationships favorable to the interests of the city of Huy”. And to evoke the participation of young Hutois artists in the Nanyang music festival but also this Chinese cultural week organized in Huy. Eric Dosogne still remembers these boxes of masks offered by the Chinese Embassy in Huy at the start of the Cavid pandemic.
Who could the “crime” benefit?
Yes, he has had relations with China but by pursuing a goal: the promotion of the city of Huy and “Show that we could be an interesting partner for them both in terms of tourist and economic or cultural level”. Bierset Airport is not far away and it is an entry point in Europe of Chinese tourists. Since 2002 too, most of the Chinese ambassadors have come on a working visit to hum“In perfect transparency, without ever posing the slightest problem to anyone”. During these meetings, Eric Dosogne says that he never discussed the Ecolo Samuel Cogolati. This would have been the case he would have refused “firmly” to do it.
The former bourgmestre of Huy rebuilt by state security: he would have spied on a federal deputy for China
Here, and these contacts with state security? Yes, he had it; “She wanted to draw my attention to the sensitive nature of the relationships to have with China”. The socialist Hutois affirms, he has never made the slightest commitment or posed the slightest act which would be likely to harm the interests of the city of Huy or to the respectability of each of his citizens, he says.
Eric dosogne se dit “Surprised and dismayed” by the article published this morning “which is not based on any concrete fact”. And to recall that, as the article in question indicates, “The intelligence file has not been sent to justice, no criminal reprehensible fact having been demonstrated”. And also to assert that he has not withdrew any personal advantage “In this case”. Finally, “I affirm my total innocence in what seems to be criticized for me and to everyone who could say that there is no smoke without fire, I ask to think about who could well benefit the” crime “which is imputed to me”.
