Charlie Hebdo: life sentence for jihadist Peter Cherif

Jihadist Peter Cherif was sentenced to life imprisonment in France on Thursday. He was tried before the special assize court in Paris for the role he may have played in Yemen with Chérif Kouachi, one of the attackers of Charlie Hebdo in 2015. He was also appearing for the kidnapping of three humanitarians in 2011

This sentence was accompanied by a security period of 22 years. The president of the special assize court explained that this decision had been taken “in view of the seriousness of the facts” alleged and the “dangerousness” of Peter Cherif.

On Wednesday, at the end of almost three weeks of trial, the two attorneys general requested life imprisonment against him, requesting that this sentence be accompanied by a security period of 22 years.

Peter Cherif’s counsel denounced in their pleadings Thursday morning a “fixed match”.

For Me Nabil El Ouchikli, “the purpose” of the public prosecutor’s office “is to eliminate Peter Cherif, and for that we are obliged to (…) have him convicted in relation to the attacks” of January 2015.

The jihad veteran, aged 42, had been on trial since September 16 for criminal terrorist association between 2011 and 2018, the period of his presence in Yemen within Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).

He is accused of having joined the ranks of this jihadist organization and, in this context, of having participated in the training of his childhood friend Chérif Kouachi in the attack committed on January 7, 2015 in Paris on the satirical newspaper Charlie Weekly, where 12 people were murdered. The attack was claimed by AQAP.

He is also appearing for the organized gang kidnapping in 2011, for more than five months, of three French nationals, members of the NGO Triangle Génération Humitaireitaire.

Even though he used his right to silence most of the time during the trial, Peter Cherif admitted to having been one of the jailers of the three humanitarian workers. He served as a “translator” to interface between the hostages and their Yemeni al-Qaeda captors. On the other hand, he denied having played a role in the Charlie Hebdo attack.

The attorneys general requested that he be declared “guilty” of all the charges against him, painting for more than four hours the portrait of an “integral jihadist”, “the cornerstone of preparation” of the Charlie Hebdo attack. According to them, its dangerousness is always “maximum”.

Concerning the section on Charlie Hebdo, Me El Ouchikli observed that his client was not judged for “complicity”. According to him, “the public prosecutor admitted that he did not have the elements” in this sense “and got around” the difficulty by accusing him of “criminal terrorist association”, a very flexible offense and often qualified of tote.

His colleague, Me Sefen Guez Guez, criticized the elements on which the public prosecutor relied to demonstrate the guilt of Peter Cherif – in particular declassified notes and statements from an arms trafficker. “Is that enough to construct a judicial truth?” he said. “I don’t think so.”

The lawyers tried to respond to the multiple criticisms of the silence observed by Peter Cherif during the debates.