In a historic vote following an emotionally charged debate, British MPs approved, on Friday November 29, at first reading, the legalization of assistance in dying for certain terminally ill patients. The bill, which concerns England and Wales, mobilized parliamentarians across traditional political divisions.
It will still have to go through several stages before its final adoption. But, nine years after the rejection of a previous text by the House of Commons, the deputies this time aligned themselves with 330 votes for (275 against) on the growing support of the British population for the legalization of assisted suicide, after almost five hours of debate.
Labor MP Kim Leadbeater, who introduced the bill, welcomed the bill, saying on the BBC that Parliament had risen “at its best”with a debate “very respectful”. During the examination of the text, she assured that it would give “choice, autonomy and dignity” to adults in the terminal phase of an illness, having only six months or less to live, while emphasizing that this right would be governed by “very strict criteria”. Patients must be able to express an informed choice and take the substance causing their death themselves. Two doctors and a judge will have to agree.
Also read the meeting | Article reserved for our subscribers “The last evening” of a radical activist for assisted suicide
Read later
Three quarters of residents support the law change
The Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, who had not spoken until now, voted in favor of the text, as in 2015. He had not given his majority any voting instructions. According to a recent YouGov poll, three quarters of people in England and Wales support the change in law. Dozens of supporters and opponents of the text gathered in front of Parliament on Friday.
At the end of the vote, the organization Dignity in Dying (“dignity in the face of death”) welcomed “a historic step towards better choice and better protection for dying people”. The Care Not Killing association, opposed to assisted suicide, said it “disappointed”emphasizing a result “extremely tight”. Currently, assisted suicide is illegal and carries a penalty of fourteen years in prison in cases of aiding or abetting.
Also read the column | Article reserved for our subscribers Assisted dying: “Accompanying a person will never shorten their life”
Read later
During the debate, many deputies spoke, sometimes on the verge of tears, of the experience of a loved one to support their support or opposition to the text. Kim Leadbeater told the story of Norman, a man suffering from prostate cancer for fifteen years who “shot himself in the head” when the pain became unbearable. Current law “is unclear and does not protect patients, families and health personnel, which pushes people to desperate actions”she added.
Examination in committee before return to Parliament
For several weeks, the prospect of the vote has raised an intense debate on ethical, religious but also financial foundations. Around thirty spiritual leaders had shared their “deep concern”worrying that fragile people feel a “duty to die” to relieve their loved ones. “How can we guarantee that an elderly person in a retirement home, who has been given six months to live, will not say to themselves: “I am a burden, (…) If I end my life now, my family will be able to save 25,000 to 55,000 pounds”? »asked Richard Burgon, an independent MP.
The Memorable World
Test your general knowledge with the editorial staff of “Le Monde”
Test your general knowledge with the editorial staff of “Le Monde”
Discover
Rather than assistance in dying, many opponents have called for better funding for palliative care, while the public health system is going through a deep crisis. Kim Leadbeater assured that this law contained “the strongest guarantees and protections in the world” and had not “nothing to see” with those of Canada or Belgium, with much broader criteria.
Read also | Article reserved for our subscribers In the United Kingdom too, the debate on assisted death intensifies
Read later
The text must now be examined in committee, before being resubmitted for approval by both Houses of the British Parliament. During these stages, “we need to answer all the questions that have been raised today”citing palliative care, the rights of people with disabilities and the state of the health system, acknowledged Mme Leadbeater on the BBC.
Scotland, which has delegated powers in matters of health, must vote on its own bill in 2025. The Isle of Man is also examining a text, while the Channel Island of Jersey has validated the preparation of a law by 2027.
